PDA

View Full Version : would you go for the ride?


hyde
08-22-2005, 09:52 PM
http://news.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/spl/hi/pop_ups/05/sci_nat_launch_day_for_space_shuttle_discovery/img/1.jpg

DasLeben
08-22-2005, 09:53 PM
I'd take that ride in a second and not look back.

CCass
08-22-2005, 09:53 PM
In a New York minute.

Duffman
08-22-2005, 09:57 PM
Why would anyone not take the ride?

When in your life would you be able to do something that would even come close to this.

istewart
08-22-2005, 09:58 PM
[ QUOTE ]
When in your life would you be able to do something that would even come close to this.

[/ QUOTE ]

This reasoning is horribly gay.

touchfaith
08-22-2005, 10:00 PM
I have no desire to strap a roman candle to my ass and ride home on the flying brick.

I'd rather go up in a Blackbird if I had to choose...

Kama45
08-22-2005, 10:02 PM
Only if it involved me, Alba, and the Mile High Club.

Slow Play Ray
08-22-2005, 10:06 PM
Maybe it makes me a p*ssy, but no f'n way. Not in that thing.

dibbs
08-22-2005, 10:07 PM
I gotta admit I was really expecting something else here. No, no I wouldnt.

Los Feliz Slim
08-22-2005, 10:09 PM
Heeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeell no.

Scares the living crap out of me.

Sephus
08-22-2005, 10:13 PM
easy yes.

YourFoxyGrandma
08-22-2005, 10:52 PM
By far the most unsafe way to travel. Hells no.

TStoneMBD
08-22-2005, 11:05 PM
how much do i get paid?

spamuell
08-22-2005, 11:07 PM
It looks incredibly fun. Just how likely is it that I'm going to die?

mike l.
08-22-2005, 11:07 PM
why would i do such a thing other than the monetary reward that might come from talk show appearances and book deals later?

space is boring. who gives a fvck? people are retards.

SoCalRugger
08-22-2005, 11:20 PM
"You know we're sitting on four million pounds of fuel, one nuclear weapon and a thing that has 270,000 moving parts built by the lowest bidder. Makes you feel good, doesn't it?"

That being said, I'd definitely do it.

shant
08-23-2005, 12:21 AM
Actually I enjoy my life currently and wouldn't get into a spacecraft that [censored] rocket scientists can't keep from falling apart.

jacki
08-23-2005, 12:24 AM
I'd go into space,

but not on the shuttle.

squeek12
08-23-2005, 12:35 AM
I did Mission Space 3 times in a row at Disney, does that count?

IronDragon1
08-23-2005, 12:43 AM
Just going up without any of the stuff astronauts do to get acclimated to weightlessness-no?

With the proper training-sure

Stu Pidasso
08-23-2005, 12:44 AM
[ QUOTE ]
It looks incredibly fun. Just how likely is it that I'm going to die?

[/ QUOTE ]

I heard/read somewhere that when the shuttle was originally designed, someone calculated the chance of having a catastrophic failure on any given flight to be around 1 in 75. Given the shuttles track record, that figure probably isn't far off.

My initial gut response was "hell yeah I'd take that ride" Upon reflection I think I would have gone on the very first launch(kinda of a trailblazing thing), but for some routine launch - I'd rather get better than 1 - 75.

Stu

pokerdirty
08-23-2005, 03:35 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
It looks incredibly fun. Just how likely is it that I'm going to die?

[/ QUOTE ]

I heard/read somewhere that when the shuttle was originally designed, someone calculated the chance of having a catastrophic failure on any given flight to be around 1 in 75. Given the shuttles track record, that figure probably isn't far off.

My initial gut response was "hell yeah I'd take that ride" Upon reflection I think I would have gone on the very first launch(kinda of a trailblazing thing), but for some routine launch - I'd rather get better than 1 - 75.

Stu

[/ QUOTE ]

113 total shuttle flights, 2 "accidents" so, 1:56.5?

looks like a fold pf to me...

Forbin
08-23-2005, 03:45 AM
No question... yes all the way. I'd go tomorrow if they'd let me.

I applied at NASA a few years back, but was turned down at the time because I had had LASIK surgery. They like 20/20 vision, but aren't sure of the long term or zero-G effects of it yet (at least not sure enough of it for NASA). So I was turned down, but told to reapply later on down the road if/when they decide LASIK is ok. With the potential coming up for getting to space without NASA, I'm not sure I'll reapply... we'll have to see.

housenuts
08-23-2005, 03:51 AM
who are all the sandy vag's that say no? i would repeatedly go up in that thing as many times as possible

EliteNinja
08-23-2005, 04:47 AM
yes

DasLeben
08-23-2005, 05:14 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
It looks incredibly fun. Just how likely is it that I'm going to die?

[/ QUOTE ]

I heard/read somewhere that when the shuttle was originally designed, someone calculated the chance of having a catastrophic failure on any given flight to be around 1 in 75. Given the shuttles track record, that figure probably isn't far off.

My initial gut response was "hell yeah I'd take that ride" Upon reflection I think I would have gone on the very first launch(kinda of a trailblazing thing), but for some routine launch - I'd rather get better than 1 - 75.

Stu

[/ QUOTE ]

113 total shuttle flights, 2 "accidents" so, 1:56.5?

looks like a fold pf to me...

[/ QUOTE ]

Since when is 113 flights even a sample size?

You play poker? /images/graemlins/wink.gif

zephed
08-23-2005, 05:24 AM
If I could walk on the moon, then yes.

cadillac1234
08-23-2005, 08:57 AM
Remember this is post-1970 NASA. The really smart and ambitious scientists all got jobs in the private sector.

The guy in charge of your safety is probably worried about leveling up his ranger on Everquest

Quercus
08-23-2005, 11:19 AM
Engineers put the odds of catestrophic failure at 1:100. Management put the odds of failure at 1:100000.

At least, that's according to Richard Feynman (http://www.ralentz.com/old/space/feynman-report.html) , who served on the commission investigating the Challenger explosion.

The shuttle has been a giant purposeless waste of money.

I am all for space exploration and I am all for manned space flight. But, I would have vastly preferred to see Nasa fund projects designed to get humans and materials into space cheaply and safely rather than the bloated monstrosity that is the shuttle.

Patrick del Poker Grande
08-23-2005, 11:26 AM
[ QUOTE ]
I'd go into space,

but not on the shuttle.

[/ QUOTE ]
Would you rather go up in the Soyuz?
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/2/27/Soyuz_rocket_ASTP.jpg
That's pretty much your only other option right now.

jakethebake
08-23-2005, 11:27 AM
Anyone else notice the rocket scientist avoided answering the question? /images/graemlins/tongue.gif

Patrick del Poker Grande
08-23-2005, 11:28 AM
[ QUOTE ]
I am all for space exploration and I am all for manned space flight. But, I would have vastly preferred to see Nasa fund projects designed to get humans and materials into space cheaply and safely rather than the bloated monstrosity that is the shuttle.

[/ QUOTE ]
The Space Shuttle is the cheap way. Or at least was at the time. The next generation (CEV (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crew_Exploration_Vehicle)) is coming soon.

Patrick del Poker Grande
08-23-2005, 11:28 AM
[ QUOTE ]
Anyone else notice the rocket scientist avoided answering the question? /images/graemlins/tongue.gif

[/ QUOTE ]
Oh yeah. I'd go in a heartbeat.

HopeydaFish
08-23-2005, 11:41 AM
[ QUOTE ]

The guy in charge of your safety is probably worried about leveling up his ranger on Everquest

[/ QUOTE ]

LOL...that's one of the funnier things I've read on here...mostly because it's probably true. /images/graemlins/smile.gif

miajag81
08-23-2005, 12:12 PM
In a heartbeat.

If I died I would at least get an elementary school named after me or something.

Dominic
08-23-2005, 12:21 PM
in a heartbeat. tomorrow, if they asked.

astroglide
08-23-2005, 12:27 PM
risk/reward ratio is not in line for me, so no.

jakethebake
08-23-2005, 12:31 PM
[ QUOTE ]
risk/reward ratio is not in line for me, so no.

[/ QUOTE ]

Your name is astroglide for god's sake! /images/graemlins/tongue.gif

CORed
08-23-2005, 01:13 PM
I would love to go into space, but I don't trust the shuttle. Over a year down time and God knows how many million dollars, and they still can't keep the damn foam insulation from falling off of the fuel tank. NASA has fallen far since the moon landing.

CORed
08-23-2005, 01:17 PM
[ QUOTE ]
I have no desire to strap a roman candle to my ass and ride home on the flying brick.

I'd rather go up in a Blackbird if I had to choose...

[/ QUOTE ]

The Blackbird is a fine piece of engineering. The shuttle is a cobbled together mess of cost cutting compromises.

housenuts
08-23-2005, 01:25 PM
[ QUOTE ]
I am all for space exploration and I am all for manned space flight. But, I would have vastly preferred to see Nasa fund projects designed to get humans and materials into space cheaply and safely rather than the bloated monstrosity that is the shuttle.

[/ QUOTE ]

i'm a little slow...what are the other options?

SeaSiren
08-24-2005, 11:11 AM
in a blink Hyde...
especially if dr. jekyl is the flight attendent.
:-)