Completely pointless...... but awesome

[Ribbo]

http://www.cynical-c.com/archives/bloggraphics/lego_waterfall.JPG

[jakethebake]

Why is that water flowing uphill?

[FouTight]

thats a spectacular mind [censored]...

great photoshop on some MC escher legos.

Edit:

Guess that doesn't have to be a photo edit, could be real, but would only look right from that exact angle. neat either way.

[MrTrik]

Very Escher like.

[Ribbo]

I like the guy hanging the washing out to dry on the right /images/graemlins/smirk.gif

[CrazyEyez]

[ QUOTE ]
thats a spectacular mind [censored]...

great photoshop on some MC escher legos.

Edit:

Guess that doesn't have to be a photo edit, could be real, but would only look right from that exact angle. neat either way.

[/ QUOTE ]
It's real. I saw a website once with this and a bunch of others, with explanations for how they pulled it off. It was amazing.

[Bulldog]

That's a chick. Guys don't hang up laundry.

[mmmmmbrother]

[ QUOTE ]
Guess that doesn't have to be a photo edit, could be real, but would only look right from that exact angle. neat either way.

[/ QUOTE ]

how could that not be photoshopped

[BillNye]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Guess that doesn't have to be a photo edit, could be real, but would only look right from that exact angle. neat either way.

[/ QUOTE ]

how could that not be photoshopped

[/ QUOTE ]

the creator would use legos to create it instead.

[mmmmmbrother]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Guess that doesn't have to be a photo edit, could be real, but would only look right from that exact angle. neat either way.

[/ QUOTE ]

how could that not be photoshopped

[/ QUOTE ]

the creator would use legos to create it instead.

[/ QUOTE ]

yes but the 'legos' are still photoshopped around the physicly impossible part.

unless it is 4 dimensional lego

[offTopic]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Guess that doesn't have to be a photo edit, could be real, but would only look right from that exact angle. neat either way.

[/ QUOTE ]

how could that not be photoshopped

[/ QUOTE ]

the creator would use legos to create it instead.

[/ QUOTE ]

yes but the 'legos' are still photoshopped around the physicly impossible part.

unless it is 4 dimensional lego

[/ QUOTE ]

I disagree - I think it's a perspective trick. The parts of the aqueduct that emanate from the leftmost tower only appear to be connected to the ones on the rightmost tower, but they're really not.

[Voltron87]

awesome.

when i was a little kid i thought legoland was the [censored], i had a blast. id probably have a blast if i went again today.

why do people think its photoshopped?

[BillNye]

yea its possible the waterfall is connected at the bottom and at the top so it stays up.

[sleight]

Similar stuff based on Escher's work here (http://www.cs.technion.ac.il/~gershon/EscherForReal/)

[mmmmmbrother]

http://img394.imageshack.us/img394/9291/19rz.jpg
http://img394.imageshack.us/img394/9357/22wk.jpg
http://img394.imageshack.us/img394/4583/32ul.jpg

i dont know how people can say this is possible. i dont think its a perspective trick

[offTopic]

[ QUOTE ]

i dont know how people can say this is possible. i dont think its a perspective trick

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, I read "the answers", but I figured it was just something along the lines of the guy with the chalk drawings on the sidewalk.

[mmmmmbrother]

http://www.artchive.com/artchive/e/escher/escher_waterfall.jpg

[durron597]

link (http://www.andrewlipson.com/escher/waterfall.html)

[ptmusic]

[ QUOTE ]
link (http://www.andrewlipson.com/escher/waterfall.html)

[/ QUOTE ]

Those guys are pretty amazing. Take at look at their other projects - links at the bottom of the page. Hats off to them.

-ptmusic