Standard?

[gol4pro]

1/2 NL 6 max at pacific. I'm playing pretty tight because there's a maniac 2 to my right... and he's controlling the table. I've set a couple decent traps on him, but nothing big.

Hero has K /images/graemlins/diamond.gif8 /images/graemlins/diamond.gif in CO. Button is decently tight preflop, but loose post.

Hero raises to 6$, Button calls, BB calls (LAG dude controlling the table)

Pot 18
Flop J /images/graemlins/diamond.gif6 /images/graemlins/diamond.gif4 /images/graemlins/heart.gif
-- BB checks, Hero bets 14$, Button calls, BB folds

Pot 45$
Turn 2 /images/graemlins/club.gif
-- Hero checks, button checks (quickly)

River 4 /images/graemlins/spade.gif
-- Hero bets 23$

[ajmargarine]

Not standard. I think this would be considered spewing chips. Or rather, money.

[JihadOnTheRiver]

No, and I'll tell you specifically why. Nothing screams "missed flush draw bluff" like the check the turn, bet the river. You're going to get called 6 ways from sunday by a large majority of players. Bet the turn, 2/3 pot to pot...

[amoeba]

I don't like preflop raise out of position against lag.

[jacknine]

bluffing /w king high against a maniac doesn't sound like a good idea to me either?

[Ojo_Rojo]

If you made your bluff bet on the turn, instead of the river, you would have had more chance of it being successful and you still had your diamond outs.

Ojo_Rojo

[gol4pro]

Button was the tight passive dude-- not the maniac.

So 2/3 of the pot on turn, then fold river UI?