PDA

View Full Version : $22: Too weak with QQ in position?


spentrent
08-15-2005, 02:29 PM
10 players

Seat 8: VILLAIN ( $800 )
Seat 4: HERO ( $800 )

Blinds(10/15)

** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to Hero [ Qs Qd ]
VILLAIN calls [15].
4 folds
some guy calls [15].
HERO raises [75].
3 folds
VILLAIN calls [60].
some guy folds.

** Dealing Flop ** [ Kh, Jd, 8c ]
VILLAIN bets [30].
HERO calls [30].

** Dealing Turn ** [ 4s ]
VILLAIN bets [30].
HERO calls [30].

** Dealing River ** [ 5c ]
VILLAIN bets [50].
HERO calls [50].

kyro
08-15-2005, 02:31 PM
looks good. stacks too shallow to get cute after the PF raise. I just call down.

illegit
08-15-2005, 02:41 PM
I probably raise the flop to 110 then check it down if met with resistance. He hit a 2 outer on ya?

spentrent
08-15-2005, 03:06 PM
[ QUOTE ]
I probably raise the flop to 110 then check it down if met with resistance.

[/ QUOTE ]

On the flop, I figured there were no reasonable draws for either of us to worry about. Thus, his small bet could have been an attempt to induce me to bet into his TPTK.

Likewise, I had no reasonable draws to protect my hand from; I felt I could call for "value" here and see how he plays the turn.

[ QUOTE ]
He hit a 2 outer on ya?

[/ QUOTE ]

No, I won the hand but that wasn't the point of the question. /images/graemlins/tongue.gif

Isura
08-15-2005, 03:57 PM
Looks good. Classical WA/WB.

08-15-2005, 04:01 PM
I would have raise more pre flop, to about 100. Obviously after that I would have played post flop differently, but given the way you played preflop I think you played the hand the way you should have.

spentrent
08-15-2005, 05:14 PM
[ QUOTE ]
I would have raise more pre flop, to about 100. Obviously after that I would have played post flop differently, but given the way you played preflop I think you played the hand the way you should have.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't understand why it's obvious that you'd have played post-flop differently had you made it 100.

How would those extra 50 chips in the pot have affected your post-flop line?

spentrent
08-15-2005, 05:14 PM
[ QUOTE ]
Looks good. Classical WA/WB.

[/ QUOTE ]

What does "WA/WB" mean? Thanks.

Ixnert
08-15-2005, 05:25 PM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Looks good. Classical WA/WB.

[/ QUOTE ]

What does "WA/WB" mean? Thanks.

[/ QUOTE ]

Way ahead/way behind. As in, you are either/or, and have no good way of determining which.