djj6835
08-12-2005, 12:58 AM
I'll try to make my question as clear as possible. I'm mainly asking this of posters who have several thousand tournaments worth of records.
Say I have played my last 1000 tournaments with a 29.5% ROI and the following finish distribition, 1st-13.7%, 2nd-15.8%, 3rd-13.5%. Also assume that this group of 1000 tournaments is about a year and a half after I started playing SNGs, and not my first 1000 games played.
Ideally I would like to get a better distribution of finishes for my next 1000 that I play. I was thinking basically swapping my current 1st and 2nd distribution would be great. This would mean about a 4% increase in ROI.
Im wondering what kind of progress some other players have made as they played more games. Is this type of goal reasonable? Did your stats begin to flatten out at a certain point so that you really didnt improve your results from onle large block of data to another?
Thanks for any responses.
Say I have played my last 1000 tournaments with a 29.5% ROI and the following finish distribition, 1st-13.7%, 2nd-15.8%, 3rd-13.5%. Also assume that this group of 1000 tournaments is about a year and a half after I started playing SNGs, and not my first 1000 games played.
Ideally I would like to get a better distribution of finishes for my next 1000 that I play. I was thinking basically swapping my current 1st and 2nd distribution would be great. This would mean about a 4% increase in ROI.
Im wondering what kind of progress some other players have made as they played more games. Is this type of goal reasonable? Did your stats begin to flatten out at a certain point so that you really didnt improve your results from onle large block of data to another?
Thanks for any responses.