Grand Conspiracy Question For brad

[MMMMMM]

A lot of your postings allude to large schemes, conspiracies, etc. However you have never really drawn us a complete picture of what you think is going to happen, who is going to do it, what their motives might be, who the major and minor players are, and how much of this is slightly known, well-known/easily verifiable, and how much may have been quashed.

If you would diagram for us what you believe is the full picture, I'm sure it would be interesting, and much easier to piece together (or pick apart).

[brad]

sure. just listen to alex jones.

www.infowars.com (http://www.infowars.com)

you can download his shows off the internet *with no commercials*.

http://www.m2ktalk.net/

a 3rd party christian organization archives them and they request a donation (any amount) and actually it is password protected but if you email them theyll email user/pass right away. (i sent them 20 dollars (check mustve taken at least a week to arrive) but im kinda cheap i guess since i download his show every day).

p.s. he only discussing things that are documented (like bbc, washington post, etc.)

plus hes fun to listen to if you watch any tv whatsoever then you have time to listen to him instead since tv sucks.

i guarantee if you listen to him for a whole week (3 hours a day thats 15 hours) and you still think he doesnt have a point ill increase our wager from free buffet to free buffet and drinks. heh

[brad]

heres links i go to:

http://drudgereport.com/

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/

http://www.rense.com/

ok the rense one is half stupid but the other half is good.

http://www.propagandamatrix.com/

this one i just went to today it had stuff on blair government and pedephile rings

but all these pale in comparison to the sheer power of the alex jones radio show. seriously i think youll really like it.

[brad]

oh i forgot one that i go to every day /forums/images/icons/smile.gif

http://www.hanksgalleries.com/main.html

[MMMMMM]

I will check out the links, but I much prefer reading over listening because: 1) I can read many times faster than I can listen, and 2) when reading I can back up to double-check things.

Thanks for all the links.

[brad]

me 2 but in this case not.

also show very entertaining

[Six_of_One]

Those sites certainly provide a different viewpoint than that we see on the nightly news. But why assume that they are somehow more credible than the major networks? They have an agenda, just like CNN or Fox News or any of the others...it's just the opposite agenda.

I wish there existed a news source that was not biased toward any particular viewpoint, or at the very least, was balanced in its treatment of opposing viewpoints. I don't think that will ever happen, because in my opinion, 99+% of the population is incapable of unbiased reasoning (is that biased of me? /forums/images/icons/grin.gif ).