PDA

View Full Version : How Fast Do You Read?


theBruiser500
07-30-2005, 06:49 PM
This is easy to find out, take a book find words per line, lines per page, do some multiplication to find out how many words per page there are. Read for a few minutes, find out how far you got and how many words per minute (WPM) you read. Average is about 250 WPM I think.

I read about 350 less when I'm not concentrating, maybe more like 450 when I'm really in the zone (don't lose any comprehension when I'm into a book and reading faster).

gorie
07-30-2005, 06:51 PM
took me about 15 seconds to read this post if that helps.

not sure how to easily know the number of words on a page in a book without actually counting them out... am i missing something ?

edit: nevermind i see you're assuming the amount of words per line is the same every line. gotcha.

SmileyEH
07-30-2005, 07:14 PM
I was about 550. I think you need more categrories above 500, as I don't consider myself *that* fast a reader.

-SmileyEH

theBruiser500
07-30-2005, 07:34 PM
too late now, people above 500 just say what WPM you are (it will be interesting to see who the people are that get above 500 WPM anyway). smiley how do you read that fast? that is prtty darned fast

Talk2BigSteve
07-30-2005, 07:56 PM
722 WPM

Test yourself here... EyeQ (http://www.infmind.com/)

I thought this Infomercial was BS, then we used this program in my Educational Psychology class in college. I was amazed at how much my reading speed and retention improved.

Big Steve

theBruiser500
07-30-2005, 07:59 PM
i just bought this and am trying it out, looks promising not sure yet. it sounds like this program is wiedly used in japan, in public school systems and workds well.

Talk2BigSteve
07-30-2005, 08:02 PM
[ QUOTE ]
i just bought this and am trying it out, looks promising not sure yet. it sounds like this program is wiedly used in japan, in public school systems and workds well.

[/ QUOTE ]

So this is the reason for the post, IMHO you can't go wrong with it, faster reading AND better retention!

Big Steve /images/graemlins/cool.gif

Voltron87
07-30-2005, 08:12 PM
bruiser youre my favorite poster

theBruiser500
07-30-2005, 08:30 PM
wow i'm extremely surprised at the poll results so far, a lot of people are in the 500+ words per minute category

07-30-2005, 09:30 PM
400 WPM.

gorie
07-30-2005, 09:31 PM
[ QUOTE ]
wow i'm extremely surprised at the poll results so far, a lot of people are in the 500+ words per minute category

[/ QUOTE ]
don't forget that 80% of OOT is smarter, better looking, and healthier than the average OOTer. i am not surprised they are also excellent speed readers.

07-30-2005, 09:32 PM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
wow i'm extremely surprised at the poll results so far, a lot of people are in the 500+ words per minute category

[/ QUOTE ]
don't forget that 80% of OOT is smarter, better looking, and healthier than the average OOTer. i am not surprised they are also excellent speed readers.

[/ QUOTE ]

Also don't forget their 3 ft elephant cocks.

pudley4
07-30-2005, 09:47 PM
This site is cool.

<font color="white">984 before; 1416 after </font>

EliteNinja
07-30-2005, 10:09 PM
472 before EyeQ.
611 after EyeQ.

FourKing Hell
07-30-2005, 10:18 PM
I managed to improve from 531 to a whopping 532. Oh, the great achievements I could make if I actually purchased their product.. (they should have a minimum improvement figure for that line to come up, I think

kasey2004
07-30-2005, 11:16 PM
Thats a pretty neat little webpage.

I have learned a little speed reading back in the day. I can read something like 650 before and 900 after the tests. I think my normal reading when speed reading is around 700 when i do it alot.

/images/graemlins/spade.gif Kasey /images/graemlins/spade.gif

handsome
07-30-2005, 11:34 PM
That test is BS. Before: 601, after: 704. My "true" reading speed is no where that fast.

theBruiser500
07-30-2005, 11:59 PM
hey you 500+ WPM readers could you comment a little on how you read that lets you go that fast? een when i'm reading groups of words i still think it's only like 400 WPM, do you read whole sentences at a time? never regress? very curious about this, appreiate all comments

gunt
07-31-2005, 12:20 AM
i read this post in like 2 seconds

astarck
07-31-2005, 12:42 AM
[ QUOTE ]
i read this post in like 2 seconds

[/ QUOTE ]

I read your post in 1 second.

FourKing Hell
07-31-2005, 12:56 AM
At the test I was trying. I just went as fast as I could without thinking about it. No idea if I have a special technique.

At one point in the preparation exercises they kept showing one sentence at a time, very rapidly. Anyone able to read the whole story? I caught some sentences, but couldn't even summarize the story.

Sponger15SB
07-31-2005, 01:17 AM
[ QUOTE ]
Also don't forget their 3 ft elephant cocks.

[/ QUOTE ]

Don't worry, they are constantly on my mind.

07-31-2005, 01:56 AM
Happy Birthday.

tech
07-31-2005, 02:40 AM
Are those EyeQ scores accurate? I'm guessing not. Mine was 865 when I read every word and over 1900 when I did a speedread.

AEKDBet
07-31-2005, 02:51 AM
[ QUOTE ]
i just bought this and am trying it out, looks promising not sure yet. it sounds like this program is wiedly used in japan, in public school systems and workds well.

[/ QUOTE ]

Get yourself a binary newsgroup subscription. Downloaded in 2mins

DougOzzzz
07-31-2005, 03:33 AM
[ QUOTE ]
722 WPM

Test yourself here... EyeQ (http://www.infmind.com/)

I thought this Infomercial was BS, then we used this program in my Educational Psychology class in college. I was amazed at how much my reading speed and retention improved.

Big Steve

[/ QUOTE ]

well I suck, but I already knew that. Thankfully, the EyeQ exercises increased my speed from 300 WPM to 303 WPM. I think my problem is I have to think too much in order to comprehend what I'm reading before I move on. I could read the words a whole lot faster, but I would get nothing from what I read.

goofball
07-31-2005, 03:40 AM
how does everyone's speed not vary wildly with circumstance?

The Truth
07-31-2005, 04:39 AM
anybody else tried this Eye Q thing all the way through, or have any links to actual controled studies done with it?