10K Hands checkup and some thoughts

[hemstock]

After trying and failing at 1/2 and .5/1 I read SSHE again thoroughly and compared it to WLLH. I am now winning the limit i'm playing because I don't fold much. WLLH repeadetly advises you to find a reason to fold. With SSHE tactics I am now more aggressive. I bet and raise in situations that seem hopeless and I win pots that I would never think my cards were good enough for. I am making a LOT of crying calls that pay off. I now like to bet, raise and take control of the hand. After 10k hands it's feeling really good. Maybe it's just that the limit is very very soft. Here are my stats...
General...
http://img146.imageshack.us/img146/1102/16nb1.jpg

In more detail...
http://img273.imageshack.us/img273/6304/20gl.jpg
http://img256.imageshack.us/img256/854/39yh.jpg

Position stats
http://img92.imageshack.us/img92/485/44vb.jpg

Where does the money come from
http://img14.imageshack.us/img14/3119/50cq.jpg

Best hands
http://img177.imageshack.us/img177/3461/64bg1.jpg

Isn't AKs supposed to be a little higher?

and my worst hands.
http://img177.imageshack.us/img177/7353/76oa.jpg

Surprised to see 66 and KQ in there.

Any input would be greatly appreciated.
My plan for now is to play 50k hands on this limit because I wanna feel really confident that I can beat it. Then move up to .25/.50 and start clearing bonuses and stuff.

[McGahee]

Get that PFR up - those people who play 1/2 raise a lot because they have an edge over junk other people play. This is even more true the lower in limits you go. I have a feeling if I played .05/.1 I'd have a PFR of 45 or something.

Looks pretty good, but I'm no stat guru.

[kapw7]

I don't know the nanolimits but these stats look very solid. Except for the agression. You seem to be overagressive but I cannot argue with your winrate so far.
Don't play 50K hands at nanos. You have to move to the higher limit as soon as possible.

And find a better football team to support. /images/graemlins/wink.gif

[Paxosmotic]

I'd say it's absolutely time to move up for you. I agree with whoever said bump the PFR raise up, look for situations where you can raise first in or even just isolate. Hands like AJo, KQo, KJs and ATs can be raised from any spot on the table. You can healthily squeeze another 2-3% out of that.

No one else diss Panathinaikos, it's a health risk.

[hemstock]

How could I forget my favorite graph image /images/graemlins/smile.gif

http://img51.imageshack.us/img51/1930/graph3mn.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

I still don't wanna move up limits. I'm gonna give it a little more time.

And no jokes about Panathinaikos /images/graemlins/smile.gif

[NateDog]

I'm not stat whiz either, BUT . . .

I did play about 10K in the nanos at a winrate similar to yours. I jumped straight to .5/1 from .05/10, and ran really, really hot. Variance eventually leveled me out at 3/100 thru 30K. Anyway, your flop aggression is borderline maniacal. I wonder if this will be a hinderance when you find players that aren't limping 74o UTG. Are you contesting every pot you are in?

*Disclaimer: I'm weak-tight* /images/graemlins/grin.gif

Good luck!

[hemstock]

[ QUOTE ]
Anyway, your flop aggression is borderline maniacal. I wonder if this will be a hinderance when you find players that aren't limping 74o UTG. Are you contesting every pot you are in?


[/ QUOTE ]

Not every pot but I check-raise a lot with 2nd pair, bet marginal-weak draws and generally I do not give up a pot easily on the flop if I see that I might still be good. What's a good flop aggression number?

[Saint_D]

Check your numbers against the FAQ on this board. You look like you hit the (top of) the sweet spot for call downs. About 32% which is winning you about 50% of the pots. Right where you want to be.

If you can support the BR, move up to .5/1 at least as soon as you can. You are costing yourself money in these limits.

Get your 20-50K in there if you must get a big sample. PP .5/1 is so bad even I can beat it.

-D