PDA

View Full Version : $2K lost to slowplaying (a warning for those with FPS)


fimbulwinter
07-29-2005, 03:00 AM
villain is a big losing lag.



1: he raises button to 25, i call with KJs on BB.

KJ4 two spades

I bet, he calls

KJ4T three spades

check check

KJ4TA four spades

check check

villain tables KK




2: he limps in MP, i check 73o in BB

733

I bet, he calls

733A

I check, he checks

733AA

I check, he minbets, i call

he tables 77.




These hands happened literally one orbit apart.

fim

Benholio
07-29-2005, 03:06 AM
Anyone else feel like they just won a pot when hands like this happen?

Gotta love it...

gulebjorn
07-29-2005, 03:10 AM
Where's the 2K lost? did villain lose it?

I also miss the FPS part??

07-29-2005, 03:28 AM
I take it he means his opponent lost 2k by slowplaying. He would probably have to pay him off, but because the moron slowplayed, he didn't have to. the donk slowplayed himself out of winning 2k from fim.

gulebjorn
07-29-2005, 03:38 AM
[ QUOTE ]
I take it he means his opponent lost 2k by slowplaying. He would probably have to pay him off, but because the moron slowplayed, he didn't have to. the donk slowplayed himself out of winning 2k from fim.

[/ QUOTE ]

That would make sense.

gulebjorn
07-29-2005, 03:39 AM
also, why did you slow down on the 2nd hand?

punter11235
07-29-2005, 03:43 AM
Hello Fimbul. Great hands , looks like SSNL /images/graemlins/smile.gif
Is this Party this time ?

ryanghall
07-29-2005, 04:08 AM
To play devil's advocate, I noticed you saved a lot by slowplaying yourself here /images/graemlins/smile.gif

Ryan

fimbulwinter
07-29-2005, 04:13 AM
[ QUOTE ]
also, why did you slow down on the 2nd hand?

[/ QUOTE ]

since the guy was so tuned up all the time, i figured my "7" could look scared of his turned "ace".

basically i was just giving the guy any opportunity i could to let him bluff so that i could "resteal." 9/10 he does not have a hand here.

fim

___SK___
07-29-2005, 07:54 AM
can someone explain how he lost hand #2

if you had 73 and the board was 733AA at best you have AA333

if villian had 77, that would give him AA777.

gulebjorn
07-29-2005, 07:56 AM
[ QUOTE ]
can someone explain how he lost hand #2

if you had 73 and the board was 733AA at best you have AA333

if villian had 77, that would give him AA777.

[/ QUOTE ]
...

TheWorstPlayer
07-29-2005, 08:16 AM
Um...this dude's retarded? Or has some allergic reaction to greenbacks?

TheWorstPlayer
07-29-2005, 08:18 AM
Umm....maybe you guys just aren't familiar enough with the inner workings of Fim's mind. But it is quite obvious that although Villain won the hands, he should have stacked Fim on both of them, but instead he slowplayed ad infinitum and never made anything out of them.

mosuavea
07-29-2005, 08:19 AM
[ QUOTE ]
can someone explain how he lost hand #2

if you had 73 and the board was 733AA at best you have AA333

if villian had 77, that would give him AA777.

[/ QUOTE ]

VIllian did win, he just didnt win much in comparison to what he could have

___SK___
07-29-2005, 08:52 AM
sorry sorry sorry, didnt pick that up, yes i see it now. sorry i am working graves, rather scattter brained at this time.

theben
07-29-2005, 08:54 AM
i;d like to think i would have broken you in the first hand, or at least seriously harmed your stack.

however, its possible i would have botched the second hand

TheWorstPlayer
07-29-2005, 09:50 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
also, why did you slow down on the 2nd hand?

[/ QUOTE ]

since the guy was so tuned up all the time, i figured my "7" could look scared of his turned "ace".

basically i was just giving the guy any opportunity i could to let him bluff so that i could "resteal." 9/10 he does not have a hand here.

fim

[/ QUOTE ]
The funniest thing is that you know he would have been firing away if he didn't have a hand. So basically you can trap him when he bluffs and he doesn't even capitalise on that image when he makes the nuts. Awesome!