2nd batch of 500 11s

[DMACM]

My first 500 my ROI was 8 so I think I'm seeing some real improvement owed to lots of really helpful comments on here and lately to eastbays tool which exceeded my expectations. In my next 500 I want to try for the 40% ROI that people say is attainable at the 11s but I doubt I'm good enough to acheive that without a lot of luck. Too many thirds? Thanks for looking.

PARTY 11

loss 298
3rd 80
2nd 58
1st 64

ROI 19
ITM 40

[Isura]

More bubble and prebubble aggression (5-6 handed) and you should be on okay.

[bmxreed36]

Nice job, any time you can improve your ROI by that much it should feel good. 40%?...now that's something to shoot for, gl. I do think the number of 3rds is a little high, try to work on goin for it all once you're in the money and possibly building a bigger stack on the bubble. When do you think you'll move up?

[astarck]

Move up to the 22s. The play is just about the same.

[DMACM]

Thanks, I already do some 20s but im gonna focus on 11s because I hate variance. Itll probalby be a while before I do anything above 20.

[DMACM]

Its really that similar? What kind of ROI is possible there?

[Mr_J]

"Its really that similar? What kind of ROI is possible there?"

Yes, and if you're 20% at the $11s I don't doubt you'd probally get ~15% at the 22s. Don't worry about what kind of ROI is possible, just move up.

[astarck]

1 less idiot on each table.

[The Don]

No way 40% is possible in the long term. I believe that 32% is the absolute maximum.

Anyway at the $22s there is one less idiot but you get the advantage of way more FE to offset this.

[45suited]

[ QUOTE ]
No way 40% is possible in the long term. I believe that 32% is the absolute maximum.

[/ QUOTE ]

What is the magic of the 32% figure? It's kind of, well, wrong to make statements like this as if they are facts. As Lorinda has stated in the past, 40% is possible long term at the 11s. Not saying it is easy, but it is possible. Of course, anyone at this figure would move up to the 22s.

That said, good job to the OP on your 19%... Nice work.

[Isura]

[ QUOTE ]
Its really that similar? What kind of ROI is possible there?

[/ QUOTE ]

30%.

[nate_king1]

Nice stats, keep it up!

How long did it take for your first and second 500?

I'm hoping to replicate this for my first 500.

[The Don]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
No way 40% is possible in the long term. I believe that 32% is the absolute maximum.

[/ QUOTE ]

What is the magic of the 32% figure? It's kind of, well, wrong to make statements like this as if they are facts. As Lorinda has stated in the past, 40% is possible long term at the 11s. Not saying it is easy, but it is possible. Of course, anyone at this figure would move up to the 22s.

That said, good job to the OP on your 19%... Nice work.

[/ QUOTE ]

Show me the screenshot of the poker/sng tracker with at least 2000 played and a 40% ROI then I will buy it. No way 40% is possible IMO. I also said "I believe" 32% to be the maximum... so I didn't mean it to be a fact, merely my opinion.

[dmmikkel]

[ QUOTE ]
More bubble and prebubble aggression (5-6 handed) and you should be on okay.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm impressed how people always get so much information out of a samplesize thats not even big enough for knowing your ITM%. I wouldn't look at finish distribution before atleast 1k total sngs.

[DMACM]

The first 500 took months because after playing like 200 at a net loss I took a long break from sit and goes and went back to NL full ring cash games where I have done most of my play. This last 500 was probably a week and a half to 2 weeks, 6-8 tabling mostly and playing a lot.