More profitable: Sit and Go's or ring games? How big of a sample?

[Toddy]

Im wondering what I'm better at SNG's or Ring. I was wondering how big of a sample I'd need. I was thinking of playing 100 $25+2 SNG's over the next couple weeks and then Im wondering how long I should play in a 2-4 room to measure. Thanks

[Colonel Kataffy]

Well, it doesn't really matter how many hours youplay ring games because 100 sngs isn't close to being enough.

[zipppy]

[ QUOTE ]
Im wondering what I'm better at SNG's or Ring. I was wondering how big of a sample I'd need. I was thinking of playing 100 $25+2 SNG's over the next couple weeks and then Im wondering how long I should play in a 2-4 room to measure. Thanks

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, however long it takes you to play X amount of SNGs is probably how long you should play ring games to measure the difference.

[yeau2]

zippy couldnt have said it better. Hours, not amount of sngs played. Also, if your gonna compare turbo 27s on stars to its 2-4 game, 27s are gonna be more profitable, imo. If your skill level is equal in both, that is.

[skierdude1000]

Ring is more profitable, but easier to lose money as well. I think that's a decent general statement