PDA

View Full Version : Good NL Games


lehighguy
07-25-2005, 03:26 AM
I'm looking for a sight with juicy NL cash games. At least $100-200NL and up. Parties games blow. Any good sight suggestions.

fimbulwinter
07-25-2005, 05:01 AM
[ QUOTE ]
Parties games blow.

[/ QUOTE ]

what what??!?!?!!?

fim

Alex/Mugaaz
07-25-2005, 05:32 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Parties games blow.

[/ QUOTE ]

what what??!?!?!!?

fim

[/ QUOTE ]

lehighguy
07-25-2005, 05:40 AM
They do. At $200NL and up. Average pots are dogshit compared to some wites I've played. That are all tight asses.

Anyway, if you think those are the best games you obviously can't help me.

fimbulwinter
07-25-2005, 06:01 AM
[ QUOTE ]
They do. At $200NL and up. Average pots are dogshit compared to some wites I've played. That are all tight asses.

Anyway, if you think those are the best games you obviously can't help me.

[/ QUOTE ]

1. i don't think they're the best games

2. i still think they're very good

3. if you think they players are weaktight, just play 6max. winning tons of small pots can be worth every bit as much as peddling the nuts and has much lower variance. i have a feeling you might be angry with all the weak/tight nut peddling play because you do the same yourself.

fim

punter11235
07-25-2005, 06:10 AM
SportingBet is ultimate paradise. Guys at 400NL are worse than average 25NL guys at other sites. The problem is that there is rarely any games going.

lehighguy
07-25-2005, 06:41 AM
Hehe...no.

I currently play games where the average pot is at least 1/3 or the buy-in, somtmies 1/2. Party doesn't even come close.

I already play 6-max.

lehighguy
07-25-2005, 06:47 AM
Is there any way to view the games without making an account. If I like it I want to sign up as my own affiliate for rakeback. Can you make multiple account on the same computer or are you locked in like with party.

What are teh average pots like?

Master5hake
07-25-2005, 11:59 AM
off topic to your orig post - but your idea of being your own affiliate just slapped me across the face as one of those 'why the hell didn't I think of that before' moments -

what is involved in becoming an 'affiliate' for one of these sites, and just providing your own rake back

MarkD
07-25-2005, 12:59 PM
[ QUOTE ]
off topic to your orig post - but your idea of being your own affiliate just slapped me across the face as one of those 'why the hell didn't I think of that before' moments -

what is involved in becoming an 'affiliate' for one of these sites, and just providing your own rake back

[/ QUOTE ]

Typically it involves committing a fraudulent act of some sort. I'm guessing this leaves you vulnerable to having both the afffiliate account, and the playing account, closed and the funds siezed.

You may not get caught though so /shrug.

lehighguy
07-25-2005, 01:14 PM
What he said. However, I take my chances. On these small sights there is no rakeback programs. Moreover, on these small sights there is less incentive to catch people doing this. I've been my own affiliate on this one site for six months no problems.

Voltron87
07-25-2005, 02:02 PM
If you think parties 100 and 200 nl games blow you have no idea what youre talking about.

lehighguy
07-25-2005, 02:39 PM
I make $80/hour playing a single table of NL at another site. Sample size is large. So I wouldn't say I have no idea what I'm talking about.

Alot of these small sights have great games, they just don;t have them all the time. That is why I want to find a bunch of them.

Voltron87
07-25-2005, 03:03 PM
[ QUOTE ]
I make $80/hour playing a single table of NL at another site. Sample size is large. So I wouldn't say I have no idea what I'm talking about.

Alot of these small sights have great games, they just don;t have them all the time. That is why I want to find a bunch of them.

[/ QUOTE ]

uh, what site are you winning 80$ an hour on one table of nl 100 or 200? whats the sample size?

and if you have this "sight", why are you looking for another. party is retardly soft, get real.

WackityWhiz
07-25-2005, 03:17 PM
http://img101.imageshack.us/img101/650/howpokah4jw.jpg

I'm 100% sure that this represents everything the OP is about

lehighguy
07-25-2005, 03:26 PM
I play $600NL. But for a large portion of the year I played $200NL.

At the $200NL the average pot was $100-140. At $600NL it is $200-250.

There is usually only one game like this going at a time. Otherwise I would play more.

lehighguy
07-25-2005, 03:27 PM
Okay, believe whatever you want.

punter11235
07-25-2005, 04:01 PM
I believe it. I saw a 400NL game at SportingBet. 6-8 people saw every flop for 20$ or more then there was minbetting/minraising round and then few allins. Its possible.
I play at Paradise, for most of the time games there are pretty standard but from time to time... avg po 140$ (200NL) and 2 or 3 maniacs who lose 1.5k in 15minutes.

WackityWhiz
07-25-2005, 04:26 PM
[ QUOTE ]
Okay, believe whatever you want.

[/ QUOTE ]

I hope this is a joke because, as another poster said, if you can make 80/hour at 1 table, then why are u asking this retarded question. My opinion stands and that comic is definately you.

Voltron87
07-25-2005, 04:29 PM
look at all the in depth stats hes posted. how can you refute those!!?!?!

that comic is genius

Jdanz
07-25-2005, 08:41 PM
lehigh is mad respected. And he's been posting here a shizzle load longer then either of you, i don't know about the question's merit, but cartoon /= him

Benholio
07-26-2005, 09:43 AM
What site are you talking about, with these juicy games? Or were you wanting everyone else to cough up their spots and you keep yours a 'secret'?

Voltron87
07-27-2005, 11:40 AM
[ QUOTE ]
What site are you talking about, with these juicy games? Or were you wanting everyone else to cough up their spots and you keep yours a 'secret'?

[/ QUOTE ]

i declare ben the winner of this thread.