NL 50+ win rates

[jt_patriot]

I'm new to Poker Tracker (one week of playing with it) and I'm interested to know what kind of win rates people are getting at and above 50 NL. My sample size is still fairly small (2,500 hands) but I figure it's big enough to get a good idea of where I'm at. At 50 NL 6 max I'm making 22.62 BB/100 right now, I figure it's a little high to be sustinable, so where are you guys at? How do the win rates decrease as the limits go up?

[kingofswing]

You're PTBB is way high and will go down. A basic idea is that you're doing fine if you're at about 5-8 in the long run (10,000+ hands). If you're at 9-10, you are really playing well and could consider moving up. Anything higher than that is similar. But 9-10 is really a very good sign.

[kongo_totte]

We need a stickied FAQ. What happened to skeemes? I found no big problems with that one.

[Alpha13]

So 10 is considered the upper limit of what's sustainable? Boy that's a letdown, I was thinking 15-20 is doable.

[TheWorstPlayer]

At PL50, I'm at +23PTBB/100 over 21 hands so I think it is sustainable. Don't worry. Just keep practicing.

[Alpha13]

Dude are you going to follow me around with that sample size "joke"? /images/graemlins/smile.gif

[edge]

2500 hands means close to nothing.

[UOPokerPlayer]

I was 15+PTBB/100 at NL25 over about 25,000. I don't think that's possible to sustain any other above level. Still could be variance, but those games were some kind of juicy. My favorite move was calling big open pushes with big pairs.

Anyone know what would be considered good in terms of $/hour in NL 50 playing one table?

[fimbulwinter]

[ QUOTE ]
Anyone know what would be considered good in terms of $/hour in NL 50 playing one table?

[/ QUOTE ]

math:

10PTBB/100 * 50h/hr * $1/PTBB = 5 bucks an hour. Everyone thinks they can keep up 10 PTBB/100 going. very few actually can.

fim

[Sephus]

[ QUOTE ]
I'm new to Poker Tracker (one week of playing with it) and I'm interested to know what kind of win rates people are getting at and above 50 NL. My sample size is still fairly small (2,500 hands) but I figure it's big enough to get a good idea of where I'm at. At 50 NL 6 max I'm making 22.62 BB/100 right now, I figure it's a little high to be sustinable, so where are you guys at? How do the win rates decrease as the limits go up?

[/ QUOTE ]

its like there's a rule. if you get to 1000-2000 hands in your PT database for a level and your BB/100 is above 15, you must make a post on 2+2 asking about winrates and mentioning "yours."

[Sephus]

[ QUOTE ]
So 10 is considered the upper limit of what's sustainable? Boy that's a letdown, I was thinking 15-20 is doable.

[/ QUOTE ]

playing one table of nl50 (maybe nl100) i'd say 15 is "doable" but not by you.

[Lawrence Ng]

Wait till your AA runs into AJ on a J-J-x board about 3 times in the span of 3000 thands with super deep stacks and you will see that rate plumet like the crash of 89.

Lawrence

[skoal2k4]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm new to Poker Tracker (one week of playing with it) and I'm interested to know what kind of win rates people are getting at and above 50 NL. My sample size is still fairly small (2,500 hands) but I figure it's big enough to get a good idea of where I'm at. At 50 NL 6 max I'm making 22.62 BB/100 right now, I figure it's a little high to be sustinable, so where are you guys at? How do the win rates decrease as the limits go up?

[/ QUOTE ]

its like there's a rule. if you get to 1000-2000 hands in your PT database for a level and your BB/100 is above 15, you must make a post on 2+2 asking about winrates and mentioning "yours."

[/ QUOTE ]

I guess we should all post hands like this (http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showthreaded.php?Cat=&Number=2896372&page=5&view=c ollapsed&sb=5&o=14) and try to somehow find a way to justify it?

[Sephus]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm new to Poker Tracker (one week of playing with it) and I'm interested to know what kind of win rates people are getting at and above 50 NL. My sample size is still fairly small (2,500 hands) but I figure it's big enough to get a good idea of where I'm at. At 50 NL 6 max I'm making 22.62 BB/100 right now, I figure it's a little high to be sustinable, so where are you guys at? How do the win rates decrease as the limits go up?

[/ QUOTE ]

its like there's a rule. if you get to 1000-2000 hands in your PT database for a level and your BB/100 is above 15, you must make a post on 2+2 asking about winrates and mentioning "yours."

[/ QUOTE ]

I guess we should all post hands like this (http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showthreaded.php?Cat=&Number=2896372&page=5&view=c ollapsed&sb=5&o=14) and try to somehow find a way to justify it?

[/ QUOTE ]

that thread had originality in spades. i'm sorry you didn't like it but at least you hadn't seen it before.

by the way, if poker tracker says my bb/100 is 150, does that mean my pokertrackerbb/100 is 150?

[skoal2k4]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm new to Poker Tracker (one week of playing with it) and I'm interested to know what kind of win rates people are getting at and above 50 NL. My sample size is still fairly small (2,500 hands) but I figure it's big enough to get a good idea of where I'm at. At 50 NL 6 max I'm making 22.62 BB/100 right now, I figure it's a little high to be sustinable, so where are you guys at? How do the win rates decrease as the limits go up?

[/ QUOTE ]

its like there's a rule. if you get to 1000-2000 hands in your PT database for a level and your BB/100 is above 15, you must make a post on 2+2 asking about winrates and mentioning "yours."

[/ QUOTE ]

I guess we should all post hands like this (http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showthreaded.php?Cat=&Number=2896372&page=5&view=c ollapsed&sb=5&o=14) and try to somehow find a way to justify it?

[/ QUOTE ]

that thread had originality in spades. i'm sorry you didn't like it but at least you hadn't seen it before.

by the way, if poker tracker says my bb/100 is 150, does that mean my pokertrackerbb/100 is 150?

[/ QUOTE ]

the first part of your reply makes no sense at all /images/graemlins/confused.gif

the second part, ya, I was confused by it all. That's why I asked. trying to embarrass me won't get you very far

[crosse91]

word, my rate drop from 7.5 to about 4 last night....brutal (i only have about 10000 hands tho)