View Full Version : Standard?
Two_Slick
07-20-2005, 11:44 AM
Villain (CO) here is a sharp player (TAG, possibly 2p2er).
Party Poker (6 max, 6 handed) $5/10converter (http://www.selachian.com/tools/bisonconverter/hhconverter.cgi)
Preflop: Hero is SB with 6/images/graemlins/heart.gif, A/images/graemlins/spade.gif.
<font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, CO calls, BB checks.
Flop: J/images/graemlins/spade.gif, 3/images/graemlins/diamond.gif, 8/images/graemlins/spade.gif <font color="#0000FF">(4 players)</font>
Hero checks, BB checks, UTG checks, CO checks.
Turn: 6/images/graemlins/diamond.gif <font color="#0000FF">(4 players)</font>
Hero Bets, BB folds, UTG folds, CO calls.
River: 4/images/graemlins/heart.gif <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
Hero bets, CO raises, Hero folds.
Final Pot: ~ 7BB
Bison please fix the hand converter to work with PP again
Two_Slick
07-20-2005, 12:30 PM
A yes or no will do (or a yes you idiot). Feedback please.
spydog
07-20-2005, 12:35 PM
I think the converter messed up the preflop action.
I'm not completing in the SB with A6 if there will be 4 to the flop. I need a stronger ace, like A6s or A9o.
Flop: ok.
Turn: bet is ok.
River: I would check-call and hope to collect from a busted draw. There are not enough worse hands that call here to make this a worthwhile value bet.
Two_Slick
07-20-2005, 12:54 PM
Thank you. Short-handed I often am lost for what hands to play out of the SB and on the Button (and I end up playing weak aces probably more than I should).
I agree with your river analysis.
StellarWind
07-20-2005, 01:46 PM
I'm not usually completing A6o to play 4-way with this blind structure.
Why did a strong player call the turn at 3-1 after letting the flop check through? Probably because he has a six or a diamond draw.
You should bet the river to collect from another six or a flush draw with a four. I'm guessing he actually had 75 for his raise.
Two_Slick
07-20-2005, 04:11 PM
[ QUOTE ]
I'm not usually completing A6o to play 4-way with this blind structure.
Why did a strong player call the turn at 3-1 after letting the flop check through? Probably because he has a six or a diamond draw.
You should bet the river to collect from another six or a flush draw with a four. I'm guessing he actually had 75 for his raise.
[/ QUOTE ]
I can't see the villain limping with a 75. The more I think about it, the more I think he was either slowplaying a set, or bluffing me out with a busted draw?
Anyone else care to comment?
luckyharr
07-20-2005, 04:14 PM
Does a sharp player, possible 2+2er, open limp any hands in the cutoff?
Two_Slick
07-20-2005, 04:15 PM
[ QUOTE ]
Does a sharp player, possible 2+2er, open limp any hands in the cutoff?
[/ QUOTE ]
Sorry, Hand Converter messed up the hand... UTG limped.
luckyharr
07-20-2005, 04:21 PM
I would have looked him up on this one. A sharp player would not slow play a set on that flop (two spades.) Also, I don't think he would just call on a turned set (plus he probably would not have overlimped preflop with 66.) The only thing that might make sense is a rivered set? More often, he's just reading you for a marginal hand and stealing the pot.
luckyharr
07-20-2005, 04:26 PM
[ QUOTE ]
I would have looked him up on this one. A sharp player would not slow play a set on that flop (two spades.) Also, I don't think he would just call on a turned set (plus he probably would not have overlimped preflop with 66.) The only thing that might make sense is a rivered set? More often, he's just reading you for a marginal hand and stealing the pot.
[/ QUOTE ]
Actually, if he would limp with 75s, that hand makes sense since he has a double gutter on the turn.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.