10-31-2001, 03:06 PM
I would have layed some big odds. If you believe the recent posts from "Mark Glover" and "Mark Glover's Editor" apparently the posts were a collaborative effort. I have no reason to doubt that it was nor do I think it's a big deal. However, apparently one or both has taken issue with a comment by Ray and they wrote some posts that Mason deleted. I read the posts that were deleted and I knew that one or both would make a post on RGP whining about it. Sure enough there is a thread there. I also knew that Gary Carson and Badger would post there usual negative comments. Very predictable too bad I couldn't make a bet on it. Also Gary made the claim that Mason deletes many posts. Quoting him exactly:
"It's becoming more and more clear why Mason deletes so many posts on 2+2."
I asked him to quantify his answer and also stated that I would guess less than 1%. It's just a tad irratating to me to read disinformation like that. Oh well not a very meaningful or interesting post.
"It's becoming more and more clear why Mason deletes so many posts on 2+2."
I asked him to quantify his answer and also stated that I would guess less than 1%. It's just a tad irratating to me to read disinformation like that. Oh well not a very meaningful or interesting post.