PDA

View Full Version : ITM varience


valenzuela
07-16-2005, 05:14 PM
after 411 SNGs I have a 35,7% ITM in the 11s...do I suck?Is it possible that Im just having a bad run? or is 411 way too little to worry, even about ITM%s...unlike other posters Ill admit I tilt a lot!! Anyway does anyone know anything about ITM variance..I have an horrible ROI as well but I wont care about that for now, Im more worried about my ITM %

citanul
07-16-2005, 05:18 PM
itm variance can be big over any sample size, and clearly the smaller the sample, the more likely the variance is to be big. to get an accurate assessment of your variance, go look over a bunch of your games from 5 handed on and see how luck treats you. do it honestly. when you get lucky to get in, don't not count that and do count the time you got unlucky and busted. this shouldn't be an incredibly difficult thing to do.

posters have posted having blocks of 500+ games with ITMs of 5% or more off from their "normal" ITM. it's not a huge thing to worry about usually.

worrying about your ITM more than your ROI is pretty silly though, for the obvious reason that one of them makes you money and the other doesn't.

citanul

Mr_J
07-16-2005, 05:27 PM
"Is it possible that Im just having a bad run?"

Sure, my first450 sngs (all $33s) were breakeven for 33% ROI (and haven't played one since, guess I've got issues with $33s now). You'll have to analyze your play though to see how much of it is bad luck and how much was tilt.

valenzuela
07-16-2005, 05:29 PM
my reason for worrying about ITM rather than ROI is cause ROI needs a bigger sample size, I wont do your exercise because Im getting screwed lately while when I used to play on party my luck was "normal" and all those HHs are erased cause I didnt know they only lasted a month back then. In fact Im a losing player on my empirepoker carrer and I just keep playing because I have a tasty affiliate deal with some site.

Freudian
07-16-2005, 05:33 PM
Could be bad luck. More likely you have one or more pretty sizeable leaks in your game (based on your posts in this forum my guess would be overaggression).

How is your finish distribution?

1: ?%
2: ?%

etc.

valenzuela
07-16-2005, 05:41 PM
errr..ok dont laugh.
1)53
2)44
3)50
4)36
5)47
6)57
7)49
8)34
9)23
10)18

big stacks fold. blins 150/300
me:1500
BB:1000
I have A3 and I fold...now thats a bad streak...

citanul
07-16-2005, 05:43 PM
it is semi reasonable to not worry too much about your roi while your sample size is small, i'll give you that.

however, to be concerned with "getting screwed" while at the same time asking a question about "variance" and also being unwilling to look over your games to see if you are *actually* getting screwed or just deceiving yourself is a dangerous thing to do. not that it's not possible that you have a wholly objective stance on your own play and results, but it's very difficult to do so.

the idea that ITM should be worried about because it stabilizes faster than ROI is a flawed one though. like i said before, only one of them concerns how much money you're making. also, remember that as a beginning/learning player these stats are going to fluctuate wildly.

citanul

citanul
07-16-2005, 05:45 PM
[ QUOTE ]
big stacks fold. blins 150/300
me:1500
BB:1000
I have A3 and I fold...now thats a bad streak...

[/ QUOTE ]

that's not really a complete hand history or anything, but that play isn't a "bad streak" it's just sort of unforgivably bad. i say unforgivably because well, we can't forgive you for such a thing, only you can, and you shouldn't be able to accept something that bad out of yourself.

citanul

valenzuela
07-16-2005, 06:01 PM
I click the fold button by mistake while I was writing my finish distribution...ok Ill do your exercise.
skill ITM:0
tilt OOTM: 0
bad luck OOTM: 1
running into a good hand and then sucking out and reaching the money..:-1
running into a good hand and finishing OOTM: 0
tilt ITM: -2
positive: my ROI should be higher
I think this is kinda flawed but oh well.
edit: a bad luck loss is when IMO an oponent clearly misplayed a hand and I loss, if they suckout on me but they played the hand correctly I wont count it.

Freudian
07-16-2005, 06:06 PM
I think you bust out in 8th-10th too often. You playing a lot of hands for a lot of chips in level 1-2?

The amount of 1st-4th is very low overall. You have 44% (and given that, your 1st-3rd is fine but you need to be around for the bubble much more often). I have 58% in the 11s.

My guess is a serious case of overaggression and inability to get away from hands where you should know you are beaten.

citanul
07-16-2005, 06:10 PM
you finish in the top 4 70% of the time in the 11s?! wow.

Freudian
07-16-2005, 06:14 PM
[ QUOTE ]
you finish in the top 4 70% of the time in the 11s?! wow.

[/ QUOTE ]

I fixed it. 1-5 was 70%. 1-4 was 58%. Looked at the wrong column. /images/graemlins/frown.gif

valenzuela
07-16-2005, 07:09 PM
This is complex realy...I thought my ROI was supposed to be 20%, but I have 10%, Im guessing -4 is bad luck and -6 is tilt...Sngs arent as fun for me anymore mainly because my last 100 have been horrible(luck &tilt) and I cant get my A-game going which is my main problem.
I only got my A-game going on a multitable when I reached 5th out of 150, I can also play my A-game on shorthanded LHE which I simply love

citanul
07-16-2005, 07:13 PM
[ QUOTE ]
This is complex realy...I thought my ROI was supposed to be 20%, but I have 10%, Im guessing -4 is bad luck and -6 is tilt...Sngs arent as fun for me anymore mainly because my last 100 have been horrible(luck &tilt) and I cant get my A-game going which is my main problem.
I only got my A-game going on a multitable when I reached 5th out of 150, I can also play my A-game on shorthanded LHE which I simply love

[/ QUOTE ]

sounds like you should concentrate more on your shorthanded lhe game then.
as those other things (sngs because they make you bored) (and mtts because well, that's just not going to be most times you play a mtt) aren't as easy to come by in terms of enjoyment for anyone. you can just sit down at a shlhe table and be playing that.

citanul

microbet
07-16-2005, 07:27 PM
[ QUOTE ]
I tilt a lot!!

[/ QUOTE ]

Too many 8-10th and this is probably why.

valenzuela
07-16-2005, 07:34 PM
MTTs are the nutz, SNGs are cool too but theyre getting under my skin lately, shorthanded LHE is cool too, I also want to learn PLO...how can someone dedicate all their time to NLHE tourneys?? I cant, anyway thanks for your help..Im still searching for my poker speciality.

citanul
07-16-2005, 09:51 PM
looking for the game or games you like the best is a big part of the fun for many players. getting stuck in a rut can be poison to the "careers" of many poker players, as at some point you are likely to get bored and hate what you're doing. i salute you in your ongoing quest to find games you like.

citanul

Ogre
07-16-2005, 11:15 PM
what happened to you playing the $50s /images/graemlins/grin.gif

citanul
07-17-2005, 03:02 AM
[ QUOTE ]
what happened to you playing the $50s /images/graemlins/grin.gif

[/ QUOTE ]

huh?

citanul

Bluff Daddy
07-17-2005, 03:04 AM
he was going to start playing the 50's on a $400 br or something

valenzuela
07-17-2005, 12:22 PM
that failed like 2 months ago....in fact partypoker confisctaed my $130 for not having a driving license. Now Im playing on empirepoker and I work for a site who gives me like $30 every 2 weeks /images/graemlins/laugh.gif. Im now focusing on short-handed ring games( which are the most easy to single-table)and whenever my affiliate program pays me I play MTTs.