View Full Version : OOT ripped off by McSweeneys
NotMitch
07-15-2005, 02:52 PM
http://www.mcsweeneys.net/2005/4/8schweiger.html
And 5 year olds is a much more interesting question anyway
Freakin
07-15-2005, 02:54 PM
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v638/pwarcham/capt.jpg
chaas4747
07-15-2005, 02:55 PM
Recursive [censored] piles make me laugh.
jakethebake
07-15-2005, 02:58 PM
http://espn.go.com/media/other/2005/0630/photo/a_catfish_458.jpg
Ulysses
07-15-2005, 04:48 PM
Wow. This is really disappointing from that publication.
Bulldog
07-15-2005, 05:00 PM
The McSweeney's article is also linked to in the Sports Guy's intern's daily links.
astroglide
07-15-2005, 05:02 PM
are they supposed to have a team of crack plagiarism investigators to analyze every article that's submitted to them? i blame the author, not mcsweeneys.
Ulysses
07-15-2005, 05:08 PM
[ QUOTE ]
are they supposed to have a team of crack plagiarism investigators to analyze every article that's submitted to them? i blame the author, not mcsweeneys.
[/ QUOTE ]
FWIW, I just wrote them.
B Dids
07-15-2005, 05:13 PM
In a sad note,
When fighting 12 year olds goes bad (http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2002383836_webbottlerocket15.html )
gumpzilla
07-15-2005, 05:14 PM
Didn't the 5 year olds thing become something of an internet phenomenon and crop up in a bunch of different places? If so, couldn't one view this article as one man's answer to a now somewhat famous question rather than an attempt to rip off the concept?
NotMitch
07-15-2005, 05:58 PM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
are they supposed to have a team of crack plagiarism investigators to analyze every article that's submitted to them? i blame the author, not mcsweeneys.
[/ QUOTE ]
FWIW, I just wrote them.
[/ QUOTE ]
Id be interested in any reply you get.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.