HYPOTHETICAL QUESTION ?

[skipperbob]

Player "R" & Player "S" play the same stakes SnG's.
Player "R" plays 1000 in a 2-week period
Player "S" plays 100 in a 2-week period
Player "R" accumulates 5995 Leaderboard points
Player "S" accumulates 5920 Leaderboard points

Is it safe/correct to say that Player "S" is a much better player than Player "R" and, to add insult to injury, if Player "S" is only a small winner for the month, then Player "R" must be stuck like a pig and "stink-on-ice" /images/graemlins/confused.gif

[microbet]

I'm not sure I can decipher your code. R = ? S = ? Oh well, I give up.

[TheUsher]

EXPERIENCE > YOUTH. /images/graemlins/wink.gif

[valenzuela]

I would guess player "R" is better since he has more points, my gut tells me player "R" 12 tabled while player "S" only 4 tabled, however player "S" seems very intrested on beating player "R" so I call it a tie... /images/graemlins/confused.gif

EDIT: player "V" has only 364 points /images/graemlins/frown.gif

[Voltron87]

you cant assume s has won more than r because of rake back

[johnnybeef]

POTM, I have not laughed so hard in quite a while, thanks skip.

[Degen]

player S is definately on a jet-fuel charged heater

[ewing55]

I guess that means player F at 20,247 is kicking your butts and player K at 3,588 will kick all you butts and take home the $$$. Hypothetically of course. /images/graemlins/tongue.gif

-----------------Jeff