adios
07-08-2005, 01:57 PM
Per Lehighguy's request.
I'm almost certain that I'm at least in the ballpark about income distribution and who's doing better and who's doing worse and why. This analysis is a little dated but basically uses the numbers that we're using in our discussion. It's technical and I haven't totally scrutinized it but I will.
Trade and Income Distribution: The Debate and New Evidence (http://www.iie.com/publications/pb/pb.cfm?researchid=94)
From the analysis:
What the findings do imply, however, is that the market process alone does not necessarily assure that the gains from trade are evenly distributed. This suggests in turn that a wide array of other equity-oriented policies should appropriately accompany a free-market (and free-trade) strategy. More narrowly, the results also suggest the potential importance of training and education in assuring that rising relative demand for skilled workers translates into broad advances for all workers rather than leaving behind a large cadre of unskilled.
I'm almost certain that I'm at least in the ballpark about income distribution and who's doing better and who's doing worse and why. This analysis is a little dated but basically uses the numbers that we're using in our discussion. It's technical and I haven't totally scrutinized it but I will.
Trade and Income Distribution: The Debate and New Evidence (http://www.iie.com/publications/pb/pb.cfm?researchid=94)
From the analysis:
What the findings do imply, however, is that the market process alone does not necessarily assure that the gains from trade are evenly distributed. This suggests in turn that a wide array of other equity-oriented policies should appropriately accompany a free-market (and free-trade) strategy. More narrowly, the results also suggest the potential importance of training and education in assuring that rising relative demand for skilled workers translates into broad advances for all workers rather than leaving behind a large cadre of unskilled.