PDA

View Full Version : River folds - routine?


tanda
07-03-2005, 10:31 PM
Opp is 53/19/0.4 after 62 hands.

Party Poker 5/10 Hold'em (6 max, 4 handed) converter (http://www.selachian.com/tools/bisonconverter/hhconverter.cgi)

Preflop: Hero is UTG with T/images/graemlins/spade.gif, K/images/graemlins/spade.gif.
<font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, BB calls.

Flop: (4.40 SB) 6/images/graemlins/heart.gif, K/images/graemlins/diamond.gif, 5/images/graemlins/club.gif <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
BB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, BB calls.

Turn: (3.20 BB) J/images/graemlins/spade.gif <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
BB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, BB calls.

River: (5.20 BB) 9/images/graemlins/spade.gif <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
BB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">BB raises</font>, Hero folds.

Final Pot: 8.20 BB

Opp is 60/3/4.0 after 33 hands. His river agg is 0.00 since he has 1 raise, 4 bets, 2 checks and 2 folds with no river calls in 9 river hands.

Party Poker 5/10 Hold'em (6 max, 3 handed) converter (http://www.selachian.com/tools/bisonconverter/hhconverter.cgi)

Preflop: Hero is Button with 3/images/graemlins/spade.gif, K/images/graemlins/spade.gif.
<font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, BB calls.

Flop: (4.40 SB) K/images/graemlins/diamond.gif, 7/images/graemlins/heart.gif, 9/images/graemlins/club.gif <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">BB bets</font>, Hero calls.

Turn: (3.20 BB) 2/images/graemlins/diamond.gif <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">BB bets</font>, Hero calls.

River: (5.20 BB) 5/images/graemlins/diamond.gif <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
BB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">BB raises</font>, Hero folds.

Final Pot: 8.20 BB

tanda
07-04-2005, 08:31 AM
Anyone?

college_boy
07-04-2005, 09:17 AM
Both look fine to me.

obithrawn
07-04-2005, 09:55 AM
I agree. Seems unlikely that you are ahead.

aba20
07-04-2005, 10:23 AM
I might call the second one if you had more hands on the villian and knew he was capable of a bluff. His stats strike me as someone who might bluff.

Mig
07-04-2005, 10:36 AM
I personnally call the first one. You have good kicker and it's headsup. For the second hand I usually check/call since I have TP with no kicker and it completes a draw. Even the non aggro player will bet into you when you check to them with as low as bottom pair. Yesterday on a very big pot a player of that type raised me on a rivered flush he had king high... It's a good place to bluff. Anyway 60 hands is not enough to have a good read on someone so I think it's an easy call vs unknown... IMO... I may be way out of track here but with 60 hands I call. If you had 20k hands on him I would definitively fold to a river raiser vs someone with 0 river raise over 20k hands /images/graemlins/blush.gif

jquattro
07-04-2005, 10:51 AM
I guess given the limit, it may be more likely that hes beating you. I dont really know. I personally have no problem calling both, and would likely win more than 1/9 of the hands.

banks
07-04-2005, 12:15 PM
I call first hand. . . i cant bring myself to fold there

does anyone raise flop on hand 2??

sam h
07-04-2005, 12:42 PM
I would not fold the second hand and would certainly raise the flop or turn.

When it comes to aggression factor, especially by street, your sample sizes make inferences completely meaningless.

banks
07-04-2005, 12:46 PM
I think in the second hand - a huge range of hands are betting that flop that you are ahead of when its 3 handed and heads up on the flop. . .you need to get a raise in before the river IMO

Jeff W
07-04-2005, 12:52 PM
I don't fold either of those. You must raise before river in hand 2.

tanda
07-04-2005, 05:16 PM
Raising the flop is my standard play.

Sometimes, against someone with some aggression, I will just call with top pair terrible kicker, especially with position.

I do this with a bad ace and sometimes a bad king since free cards are not as much of a problem. If the opp is bluffing, then calling will win the maximum and, if I am behind, I may lose less.

On the rare occasions that this situation arises and the opp checks the river and I bet, I have found that a check-raise in the spot is almost always what it represents.

Seems I can only beat a bluff. Would the opp value check-raise less than top-pair? And why would opp not bluff by continuing to lead bet?

Some say both are folds, some say both are calls, some say one but not the other is a call, some say vice versa.

Less routine than I first thought.