spentrent
06-27-2005, 02:54 PM
Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em Tourney, Big Blind is t400 (4 handed) converter (http://www.selachian.com/tools/bisonconverter/hhconverter.cgi)
SB (t1480)
Hero (t2500)
UTG (t3900)
Button (t120)
Preflop: Hero is BB with K/images/graemlins/heart.gif, Q/images/graemlins/diamond.gif.
<font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, SB raises all-in 1280, Hero calls t1080.
I believe that I can afford to lose this since the ministack needs to escape from three hands in a row to survive. I can call and lose, and still have a great chance of at least finishing ITM.
If I call and win, I increase my chances of finishing first by quite a lot since I will have nearly half the chips on the table.
SB seemed competent. He seemed to steal every time his future fold equity was threatened, so I deemed him capable of making this play with less than a monster. I realize that the first clause of the previous sentence doesn't necessarily allow me to jump to the second clause's conclusion. But what are ya gonna do...
Am I risking too much for less reward than I am assuming? Thoughts?
SB (t1480)
Hero (t2500)
UTG (t3900)
Button (t120)
Preflop: Hero is BB with K/images/graemlins/heart.gif, Q/images/graemlins/diamond.gif.
<font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, SB raises all-in 1280, Hero calls t1080.
I believe that I can afford to lose this since the ministack needs to escape from three hands in a row to survive. I can call and lose, and still have a great chance of at least finishing ITM.
If I call and win, I increase my chances of finishing first by quite a lot since I will have nearly half the chips on the table.
SB seemed competent. He seemed to steal every time his future fold equity was threatened, so I deemed him capable of making this play with less than a monster. I realize that the first clause of the previous sentence doesn't necessarily allow me to jump to the second clause's conclusion. But what are ya gonna do...
Am I risking too much for less reward than I am assuming? Thoughts?