ZeeJustin has nothing on me (first 533 tracked at 109s)

[freemoney]

I dont know how much of a heater im on, i think the cards have been good but i also think i will always kill the 109s, most were 4 tabling though now i 8 table...

# played- 533
ROI- 31%
ITM- 41%
Profit(w/o Rakeback)- $18103
Breakdown- 15.8/14/11
...suckas

[johnnybeef]

[ QUOTE ]
ROI- 31%
ITM- 41%

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
I dont know how much of a heater im on

[/ QUOTE ]

im pretty sure i do...

[freemoney]

an ROI of 20% is definitely attainable.

[johnnybeef]

[ QUOTE ]
an ROI of 20% is definitely attainable.

[/ QUOTE ]

31% roi >>>> 20% roi, and even then, im not too sure about that.

[Moonsugar]

I have you on ignore so can't read the content of your posts, but was wondering if these SnGs are included? (http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showflat.php?Cat=&Number=2486735&page=&view=&sb=5& o=&vc=1)

[freemoney]

lol yes tool, about 1k of that loss and 200 of those were at the 200s and not included.

[Myst]

Im ignoring you until you get less cocky.

[freemoney]

whats cocky?

[flyingmoose]

[ QUOTE ]
whats cocky?

[/ QUOTE ]

Oh, I don't know. Maybe making assertions about what is attainable at a certain level after playing only 500 tournaments at that level.

Or maybe it's making a post that has no point other than saying "I Roxorz teh big111"

or maybe ending posts with "suckas" for no reason, or calling other posters tools.

Could be any of that.

[Moonsugar]

I can't even read his reply but I am LMAO cause I bet it is over the top.

Playing with him is exactly the same...

[freemoney]

lol saying something is attainable is cocky?

and when zeejustin does this 10 mins before everyone wants to saint the guy

and the tool is a tool who for no reason continually links that post whenever i talk about my success/failure at my levels.

[valenzuela]

this is getting ridicoulous , ppl really need to turn thei sarcasm detector on, and ure clearly specifying ure on a luckbox period and ppl still say ure cocky....oh my. Nice stats btw, i hope u also have the balls to post ure -5 ROI over 500 tourneys, im sure u will.

[TheTimeIsUp]

ZJ announced a goal, and he announced that we would be getting updates on it.

On the other hand, you are bragging about a good run you had.

Hmmm...

[freemoney]

lol every other poster who has success has posted their results, i on the other hand have not until now, only when i was going through a rough streak had i previously, and im cocky for posting them when im doing good?

[Iamafish]

youre going to have a 50 buy-in downswing and come back crying.

[Sponger15SB]

[ QUOTE ]
I have you on ignore so can't read the content of your posts, but was wondering if these SnGs are included? (http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showflat.php?Cat=&Number=2486735&page=&view=&sb=5& o=&vc=1)

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, he has actually had a 65% ROI over his last 250 $109s.....

riiiiiite

[freemoney]

lol no, and you guys are a jealous group, i can easily show you 20k i have online, i will show you an extra 10k at least every month, and if i played more than 25 hrs a week/tops itd be alot more

[curtains]

[ QUOTE ]
ZJ announced a goal, and he announced that we would be getting updates on it.

On the other hand, you are bragging about a good run you had.

Hmmm...

[/ QUOTE ]

What's the fun of having a good run if you can't brag about it!!!!!! The glory is much more important than the $$$$$$

[flyingmoose]

[ QUOTE ]
lol no, and you guys are a jealous group, i can easily show you 20k i have online, i will show you an extra 10k at least every month, and if i played more than 25 hrs a week/tops itd be alot more

[/ QUOTE ]

And you ask why people think you're cocky?

EDIT: And it has nothing to do with jealously, buddy. Everyone loves Gigabet, Irie, Curtains, Raptor and countless other players who make a lot more than you.

[freemoney]

lol because justin and curtains post similiar things with even better results and everyone wants to make out with them, i am met with only skepticism.

[PickyTooth]

Maybe it's because you're a moron and people dont like you ?

[freemoney]

lol good thing i dont count on an anonymous forum to make friends...

[PickyTooth]

yet you count on it to boost your EGO

very logical

[raptor517]

[ QUOTE ]
lol because justin and curtains post similiar things with even better results and everyone wants to make out with them, i am met with only skepticism.

[/ QUOTE ]

i question every good run anyone ever posts. i think the numbers are ALWAYS bumped up a bit.. just my 2 cents. OH!!!, also, i dont suk anyones prack.. grats on the good run. holla

[freemoney]

lol your right this is stupid, i dont need this for my ego, i was just posting results over a good period and so many of you are jealous its sick, this forum sucks, pz

[Ryendal]

Greetings. I am proud of you, for all 2+2 readers !

[ZeeJustin]

The 100's are significantly softer than the 200's, and it would not really surprise me if 30% is attainable. I think it is very likely that the OP is on an insane heater, but he's certainly a solid winning player if these results are real, and as I said before, 30% may very well be attainable in the 100's.

For a while when I wasn't winning that much at the 200's, I found the 100's to be significantly more profitable for me. Call it ego, but I stuck with the 200's anyway, and probably lost a lot of EV as a result. I think a lot of 2+2ers would be better off playing the 100's than the 200's to be honest.

As for the issue of posting results, I have nothing against it (obviously). This is a public message board where people go for information, and this is the kind of information beginning players LOVE to see. I don't know why the OP was criticized so heavily for this.

[curtains]

I don't feel such a big diff between the 109s and 215s at all....I just dont see how it could be possibly twice as profitable to play in the 109s. I also don't think that by randomly entering 109s and 8 tabling, you can even dream of getting a 30% ROI over the long run.

Of course with stupid table selection and playing very few games anything is possible, but that's not really relevant anyway.

[raptor517]

[ QUOTE ]

I don't feel such a big diff between the 109s and 215s at all....I just dont see how it could be possibly twice as profitable to play in the 109s. I also don't think that by randomly entering 109s and 8 tabling, you can even dream of getting a 30% ROI over the long run.

Of course with stupid table selection and playing very few games anything is possible, but that's not really relevant anyway.

[/ QUOTE ]

i agree with world champion here. dead on. holla

[Sponger15SB]

[ QUOTE ]

I don't feel such a big diff between the 109s and 215s at all....I just dont see how it could be possibly twice as profitable to play in the 109s. I also don't think that by randomly entering 109s and 8 tabling, you can even dream of getting a 30% ROI over the long run.

Of course with stupid table selection and playing very few games anything is possible, but that's not really relevant anyway.

[/ QUOTE ]

really? talking to 2 $215 players the other day I was able to work out this detailed difference in skill level chart

$33- nothing - $55 - nothing - $109 - something - $215

[curtains]

I dont understand this post? What do you mean?

[microbet]

It's saying there is no skill difference between $33, $55 and $109, but the $215s are different.

[raptor517]

[ QUOTE ]
It's saying there is no skill difference between $33, $55 and $109, but the $215s are different.

[/ QUOTE ]

this is way off. the 109s are a lot tougher than the 55s. a lot. not sure what it is, they are just noticeably harder. holla

[microbet]

I know you're just replying to me since my post was last, but, just for the record, I'm not saying $33=$55=$109. I'm just interpreting what Sponger said.

edit: and Sponger was just repeating something someone else said.

[curtains]

There is huge skill difference between the 55s and 109s.

[microbet]

Same thing to you as Raptor. I'm just interpreting the post, not claiming the skill levels are the same.

[Luminous Mist]

[ QUOTE ]
Same thing to you as Raptor. I'm just interpreting the post, not claiming the skill levels are the same.

[/ QUOTE ]

No, I'm pretty sure everyone now thinks you're a moran. It's too late to fix anything...you will forever be known as the 33=55=109 guy or something. If you're lucky. If you're unlucky people will just refer to you as 'that helpless jackass.'

Sorry.

Luminous