PorscheNGuns
06-25-2005, 06:22 PM
Its frequently easy to tell when someone gets stomped on in a debate: in one's last throes, both mentally exhausted and belittled, he or she will resort to childish petty name calling. In modern political discourse, the left wingers specifically will throw their last haymaker at their Republican overlords, declaring them bigots, racists, and even (gasp!) fascists. Without further ado, I present to you the REAL truth behind right wing bigotry, hate-mongering, and neo-nazism.
From the beginning now...
*1863, Abraham Lincoln, a Republican, emancipated the slaves
*Republicans granted blacks citizenship in 1866
*Republicans passed the 14th amendment in 1868
*Republicans passed black voting rights in 1871
*Republican Teddy Roosevelt was the first President to host a black dinner at the White House
*Democrat President Woodrow Wilson attempted to entirely re-segregate Washington DC
*Republican Calvin Coolidge was the first President to ever propose legislation designed to improve race relations and created the Negro Industrial Commission (NIC)
*the Republican Platform, completely opposite the Democrat platform, included anti-lynching legislation. In 1922 Democrats filibustered and killed a bill proposed by Republicans to make lynching a federal crime.
*Until 1935, every single black legislator had been a Republican.
*Republicans passed the Civil Rights act in 1957 (Both Ted and Jack Kennedy strongly opposed it, also many Democrats filibustered this unsuccessfully)
*18 Democrats severely hampered the Civil Rights act of 1960, filibustering it for 5 days, before Republican Eisenhower managed to sign it.
*The civil rights act of 1964 was again filibustered by Democrats, only being saved by Republican Senator Everett Dickerson from Illinois.
*Republican Richard M. Nixon (who MLK Sr and Jackie Robinson campaigned strongly for and voted for) created the EEOC
*Republican Gerald Ford promotes the first black ever to position of 4 star Air Force general
*Republican Ronald Reagan signed MLK Day into a public holiday.
*Republican Ronald Reagan promotes the first black ever to 4 star army general.
*Republican Reagan appointed Colin Powell the first ever black national security advisor.
*Republican Bush appoints powell to become the first ever black Secretary of State. (then appoints the second black ever, Rice, a female, to this position) Rice was also the first ever black female NSC Chief.
*Last year the first black (a republican of course) was elected to the Georgia legislature since Reconstruction.
In Condaleeza Rice's own words :
"The first Republican I knew was my father, and he is still the Republican I most admire," Rice has said. "He joined our party because the Democrats in Jim Crow Alabama of 1952 would not register him to vote. The Republicans did. My father has never forgotten that day, and neither have I."
In all fairness, the Civil Rights act of 1964 was proposed by Kennedy, a Democrat, (and later signed by Johnson) but Kennedy did it in an opportunistic thrust for votes upon seeing the size of the black vote in '60. (Notice how civil rights was important enough for him to put off until close to re-election time) (Side note: This of course beginning the long standing trend of black manipulation by the left). Kennedy opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1957 and 1960, and is on record, along with most of the Kennedy clan of that era, as being a complete bigot and racist. And then Johnson, the racist Texan...To say that Johnson ever
gave a hoot about blacks or civil rights, beyond their vote, would be a boldfaced lie.
Now, many historically inept left wingers love to create a fantasy world in which there was a sudden, magical switch of support for racial justice and equality in 1964 from Republicans to Democrats, when Republican Barry Goldwater opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This is purely wrong, and is simply more intellectual dishonesty on the part of the left (or maybe ignorance). Barry Goldwater co-founded the Arizona NAACP. He desegregated the Arizona National Guard. He supported the Civil Rights Acts of 1957 and 1960. Yes, he did oppose it in 1964, on the record, because it severely infringed on States Rights, but in reality, doing this was instrumental in the "Southern Strategy", and thanks to Barry Goldwater, the Republicans bitch-slapped the hate mongering Democrat majority out of the South for good (one of the biggest political heists in history no less)
Just remember: Jackie Robinson, Hall of Famer, and the father of Martin Luther King Jr, campaigned FOR Richard M. Nixon and the Republican Party platform.
Now since you know that Republicans have fought tooth and nail for civil rights for close to 150 years now, and Democrats have traditionally fought tooth and nail against it, lets analyze some of the typical misleading rhetoric (read: lies) we see from the left:
On October 9, 1999 at an Iowa Jefferson-Jackson Day Dinner, Democratic Presidential Candidate Bradley exclaimed: "I remember the exact moment that I became a Democrat. It was the summer of 1964; I was an intern in Washington between my junior and senior year in college. And I was in the Senate chamber the night the 1964 Civil Rights Act passed that desegregated public accommodations in America... And I became a Democrat because it was the party of justice. It was Democrats that stepped forward that evening in the Senate and cast their vote that washed away the stain of segregation in this country."
Now anyone can pick up a history text book and discover this to be a total lie. It was the Republicans who stepped forward to end the bitter filibustering being performed by the Democrats (on top of the fact that segregation can hardly be considered washed away by the Act of 64).
I need not mention Democrats Fritz Hollings or Robert Byrd (who to this day drops the N-word on national tv). Even Lyndon Johnson and Jack Kennedy were hate mongering racists - "keep those n-words on the buses and off those streets" - is a telling comment from the kennedy tapes, on top of wire tapping Malcom X and MLK and aggressively spying on them
So, when did the Rat party become the ever inclusive, ever embracing, party of racial justice? Since they started promising them free handouts for votes? The truth is, Democrats merely manipulate blacks for political gain - nothing more and nothing less. Keep them poor, make them believe they are the victim, make them dependent on the Government (and thus the Democrats), and brainwash them into thinking Republicans are racists - that is their goal. Charles Barkley once said he had a friend who pumped gas 25 years ago. He voted Democrat then. 25 years later he still pumps gas and still votes Democrat. The question is, when are blacks going to wise up?
Furthermore, any educated person knows that the Republican track record on helping blacks is 10,000 leagues better than the Democratic track record, at any period in United States history, including now. Right now one of the most powerful people in the world is a black woman, who liberal bomb throwers repeatedly trash on because of the color of her skin. (She is frequently referred to as the house-n-word)
I ask anyone to show me proof that the Republicans, as a Party, at *at any point in history*, have not fought tooth and nail for racial justice. If you do, I will in turn show you 10 instances of Democrats, as a unified party, fighting tooth and nail for segregation, lynching, and the elimination of racial equality and civil rights.
I would also like to point out that the KKK was formed as the terrorist wing of the Democratic party. In modern terms they are a joke, relatively non-existent, yet modern liberal patho-liars continously cast Republicans and the KKK as one for the same cause(again this goes back to Democrat manipulation and brainwashing of the blacks).
Here is a blog from Matt Abbot, found here, that goes a little more into detail on this sweeping lie:
http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/abbott/050119
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More of these patterns of lies here: (link requires membership, briefing posted)
BY PATRICK SWEENEY
Pioneer Press
A top aide to the Democratic-Farmer-Labor minority in the Minnesota House apologized Tuesday for a published statement in which he said he believed many Republican legislators were "of the KKK mentality, but totally without the hoods."
Lou Harvin, a former Twin Cities television reporter who is public affairs director for House DFLers, issued a written statement less than two hours after a Republican state senator demanded an apology in a statement delivered on the
Senate floor.
"This is offensive to me," said Sen. Thomas Neuville, R-Northfield, referring to the published comments. "I call publicly for Mr. Harvin to apologize to every
Republican in this body."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What this history proves, what I am proving, is that the Party founded on racial equality and justice, the Republican Party, was and has been following through on its platform. You cannot dispute this, and you will only be committing acts of blatant intellectual dishonesty trying.
Have a nice day.
-Matt (Porsche N Guns)
(sourcing: all pertinent info can be found in a college history textbook, though probably not a college from the Northeast, as these are typical history-revisionist Marxist acadamies)
From the beginning now...
*1863, Abraham Lincoln, a Republican, emancipated the slaves
*Republicans granted blacks citizenship in 1866
*Republicans passed the 14th amendment in 1868
*Republicans passed black voting rights in 1871
*Republican Teddy Roosevelt was the first President to host a black dinner at the White House
*Democrat President Woodrow Wilson attempted to entirely re-segregate Washington DC
*Republican Calvin Coolidge was the first President to ever propose legislation designed to improve race relations and created the Negro Industrial Commission (NIC)
*the Republican Platform, completely opposite the Democrat platform, included anti-lynching legislation. In 1922 Democrats filibustered and killed a bill proposed by Republicans to make lynching a federal crime.
*Until 1935, every single black legislator had been a Republican.
*Republicans passed the Civil Rights act in 1957 (Both Ted and Jack Kennedy strongly opposed it, also many Democrats filibustered this unsuccessfully)
*18 Democrats severely hampered the Civil Rights act of 1960, filibustering it for 5 days, before Republican Eisenhower managed to sign it.
*The civil rights act of 1964 was again filibustered by Democrats, only being saved by Republican Senator Everett Dickerson from Illinois.
*Republican Richard M. Nixon (who MLK Sr and Jackie Robinson campaigned strongly for and voted for) created the EEOC
*Republican Gerald Ford promotes the first black ever to position of 4 star Air Force general
*Republican Ronald Reagan signed MLK Day into a public holiday.
*Republican Ronald Reagan promotes the first black ever to 4 star army general.
*Republican Reagan appointed Colin Powell the first ever black national security advisor.
*Republican Bush appoints powell to become the first ever black Secretary of State. (then appoints the second black ever, Rice, a female, to this position) Rice was also the first ever black female NSC Chief.
*Last year the first black (a republican of course) was elected to the Georgia legislature since Reconstruction.
In Condaleeza Rice's own words :
"The first Republican I knew was my father, and he is still the Republican I most admire," Rice has said. "He joined our party because the Democrats in Jim Crow Alabama of 1952 would not register him to vote. The Republicans did. My father has never forgotten that day, and neither have I."
In all fairness, the Civil Rights act of 1964 was proposed by Kennedy, a Democrat, (and later signed by Johnson) but Kennedy did it in an opportunistic thrust for votes upon seeing the size of the black vote in '60. (Notice how civil rights was important enough for him to put off until close to re-election time) (Side note: This of course beginning the long standing trend of black manipulation by the left). Kennedy opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1957 and 1960, and is on record, along with most of the Kennedy clan of that era, as being a complete bigot and racist. And then Johnson, the racist Texan...To say that Johnson ever
gave a hoot about blacks or civil rights, beyond their vote, would be a boldfaced lie.
Now, many historically inept left wingers love to create a fantasy world in which there was a sudden, magical switch of support for racial justice and equality in 1964 from Republicans to Democrats, when Republican Barry Goldwater opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This is purely wrong, and is simply more intellectual dishonesty on the part of the left (or maybe ignorance). Barry Goldwater co-founded the Arizona NAACP. He desegregated the Arizona National Guard. He supported the Civil Rights Acts of 1957 and 1960. Yes, he did oppose it in 1964, on the record, because it severely infringed on States Rights, but in reality, doing this was instrumental in the "Southern Strategy", and thanks to Barry Goldwater, the Republicans bitch-slapped the hate mongering Democrat majority out of the South for good (one of the biggest political heists in history no less)
Just remember: Jackie Robinson, Hall of Famer, and the father of Martin Luther King Jr, campaigned FOR Richard M. Nixon and the Republican Party platform.
Now since you know that Republicans have fought tooth and nail for civil rights for close to 150 years now, and Democrats have traditionally fought tooth and nail against it, lets analyze some of the typical misleading rhetoric (read: lies) we see from the left:
On October 9, 1999 at an Iowa Jefferson-Jackson Day Dinner, Democratic Presidential Candidate Bradley exclaimed: "I remember the exact moment that I became a Democrat. It was the summer of 1964; I was an intern in Washington between my junior and senior year in college. And I was in the Senate chamber the night the 1964 Civil Rights Act passed that desegregated public accommodations in America... And I became a Democrat because it was the party of justice. It was Democrats that stepped forward that evening in the Senate and cast their vote that washed away the stain of segregation in this country."
Now anyone can pick up a history text book and discover this to be a total lie. It was the Republicans who stepped forward to end the bitter filibustering being performed by the Democrats (on top of the fact that segregation can hardly be considered washed away by the Act of 64).
I need not mention Democrats Fritz Hollings or Robert Byrd (who to this day drops the N-word on national tv). Even Lyndon Johnson and Jack Kennedy were hate mongering racists - "keep those n-words on the buses and off those streets" - is a telling comment from the kennedy tapes, on top of wire tapping Malcom X and MLK and aggressively spying on them
So, when did the Rat party become the ever inclusive, ever embracing, party of racial justice? Since they started promising them free handouts for votes? The truth is, Democrats merely manipulate blacks for political gain - nothing more and nothing less. Keep them poor, make them believe they are the victim, make them dependent on the Government (and thus the Democrats), and brainwash them into thinking Republicans are racists - that is their goal. Charles Barkley once said he had a friend who pumped gas 25 years ago. He voted Democrat then. 25 years later he still pumps gas and still votes Democrat. The question is, when are blacks going to wise up?
Furthermore, any educated person knows that the Republican track record on helping blacks is 10,000 leagues better than the Democratic track record, at any period in United States history, including now. Right now one of the most powerful people in the world is a black woman, who liberal bomb throwers repeatedly trash on because of the color of her skin. (She is frequently referred to as the house-n-word)
I ask anyone to show me proof that the Republicans, as a Party, at *at any point in history*, have not fought tooth and nail for racial justice. If you do, I will in turn show you 10 instances of Democrats, as a unified party, fighting tooth and nail for segregation, lynching, and the elimination of racial equality and civil rights.
I would also like to point out that the KKK was formed as the terrorist wing of the Democratic party. In modern terms they are a joke, relatively non-existent, yet modern liberal patho-liars continously cast Republicans and the KKK as one for the same cause(again this goes back to Democrat manipulation and brainwashing of the blacks).
Here is a blog from Matt Abbot, found here, that goes a little more into detail on this sweeping lie:
http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/abbott/050119
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More of these patterns of lies here: (link requires membership, briefing posted)
BY PATRICK SWEENEY
Pioneer Press
A top aide to the Democratic-Farmer-Labor minority in the Minnesota House apologized Tuesday for a published statement in which he said he believed many Republican legislators were "of the KKK mentality, but totally without the hoods."
Lou Harvin, a former Twin Cities television reporter who is public affairs director for House DFLers, issued a written statement less than two hours after a Republican state senator demanded an apology in a statement delivered on the
Senate floor.
"This is offensive to me," said Sen. Thomas Neuville, R-Northfield, referring to the published comments. "I call publicly for Mr. Harvin to apologize to every
Republican in this body."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What this history proves, what I am proving, is that the Party founded on racial equality and justice, the Republican Party, was and has been following through on its platform. You cannot dispute this, and you will only be committing acts of blatant intellectual dishonesty trying.
Have a nice day.
-Matt (Porsche N Guns)
(sourcing: all pertinent info can be found in a college history textbook, though probably not a college from the Northeast, as these are typical history-revisionist Marxist acadamies)