CreamPuff
01-25-2003, 05:20 AM
Advice wanted for:
10 player satellites. No-Limit. You only have to come
in 3rd or better to get an ARUBA chip. (1st is the
same as 3rd)
Start with T1000...I believe limits start at 10-20
and SLOWLY inch up.
Im not sure if they go up in limits every 10 hands (
seems like much more) or are based on a time limit,
but let me tell you these tournaments drag much
longer than a paradise 10 seater.
I previously used a strategy of playing super-tight
the first 3-5 rounds, however I find myself with only
about T750 with 5-8 players left depending on the
tightness of my opponents. And there is still much poker
to be played! But I am handicapped due to my short stack.
My original thinking was: play tight, let some players
bust out, then with an avg of about 6 players left I should
make it into the payoff just under 1/2 the time.
It's not working.
I now think I should just play ABC ring style no-limit poker from start to finish, since I know I can play poker better than most on the table.
Can someone give me a confirmation that my original thinking
is flawed? (Im thinking the disadvantage of being short-stacked
is too great in no-limit, even if I just need 3rd place).
10 player satellites. No-Limit. You only have to come
in 3rd or better to get an ARUBA chip. (1st is the
same as 3rd)
Start with T1000...I believe limits start at 10-20
and SLOWLY inch up.
Im not sure if they go up in limits every 10 hands (
seems like much more) or are based on a time limit,
but let me tell you these tournaments drag much
longer than a paradise 10 seater.
I previously used a strategy of playing super-tight
the first 3-5 rounds, however I find myself with only
about T750 with 5-8 players left depending on the
tightness of my opponents. And there is still much poker
to be played! But I am handicapped due to my short stack.
My original thinking was: play tight, let some players
bust out, then with an avg of about 6 players left I should
make it into the payoff just under 1/2 the time.
It's not working.
I now think I should just play ABC ring style no-limit poker from start to finish, since I know I can play poker better than most on the table.
Can someone give me a confirmation that my original thinking
is flawed? (Im thinking the disadvantage of being short-stacked
is too great in no-limit, even if I just need 3rd place).