I can't argue with this logic (no content, but amusing)

[JordanIB]

I hold 7 /images/graemlins/club.gif 6 /images/graemlins/club.gif in the BB. 3 limpers, and an LP raiser (a decent tight-agressive player). I call, knowing the 3 limpers will join

Flop 5 /images/graemlins/club.gif 8 /images/graemlins/heart.gif 9 /images/graemlins/heart.gif

One of the the 3rd limper bets, PFR (pre-flop raiser) calls, I CR, fold fold, call call.

Turn is A /images/graemlins/heart.gif

PFR is tight (21/6%) and agressive, so I'm putting him on a high ace or KK, QQ that he may semi-bluff here. Check to the PFR, he bets, I raise, limper folds, PFR calls. River is a 4 /images/graemlins/heart.gif

I check, PFR bets, I make the crying call.

The hand is pretty standard, but I love the analysis from PFR afterwards:

Peanut Gallery #1: that felt good huh PFR
PFR: yeah
PFR: especially since i knew he was going t reraise the turn
PFR: and i wanted him to
Me (just knowing i'll love the answer): why would you want me to raise the turn?
PFR: to make the pot bigger
PFR: had a 1/5 chance of hitting my flush
PFR: so i wanted the pot to be a little fatter being that i would see the river anyway

EDIT: Villain takes the pot with A /images/graemlins/club.gif K /images/graemlins/heart.gif