PDA

View Full Version : Anyone watching the chop on stars


redsoxsox
06-05-2005, 11:22 PM
I usually dont watch the final table on the 350k on stars but did today. The chop is hilarious buzz right now is getting an extra 10,000 and asking for more. Glen is losing a ton of money also.

Joshssj4
06-05-2005, 11:26 PM
Then had doubled up with pocket Aces the next hand and immediately asks for a new deal.
I want to punch him in the face, am I justified?

redsoxsox
06-05-2005, 11:27 PM
lol that was hilarious I feel bad for Casinoice. Ace King is pretty hard to fold there.

Joshssj4
06-05-2005, 11:28 PM
It's not funny though, Buzz was being so stubborn even though he was getting a more then fair deal. Hopefully they'll restart and Buzz will get his.

redsoxsox
06-05-2005, 11:29 PM
Why isnt Glen saying No to this deal can wait for atleast two more to get out before he needs a deal.

Joshssj4
06-05-2005, 11:29 PM
Why risk it, variance is huge at these stakes, I would take it in a second.

Joshssj4
06-05-2005, 11:35 PM
What do you think the deal should be?

nsj
06-05-2005, 11:37 PM
I'm watching.
Regarding deals, it seems everyone is now accustomed to the chip chop idea, and then last asks for some charity from the big stacks. Then it gets done.

I was thinking about a "modified" chip chop deal watching this. Take the chip chop, then take a staggered take of each player's guarantee and throw it back in the pool for first and second. For instance, take 10k off the chip chop figure for first, 8k for second, 6k for third, 4k for fourth, and 2k from fifth, then set it up so, in addition to the chip chop, first takes 20K and second takes 10K.

The outcome in such a scenario seem pretty ideal. The chip leaders / big stacks secure a big take in the face of variance, and are the favourite to take home a substantial share (in the case of today's final table, Glenmorangie would be guaranteed ~78-79K, and be the favourite to take home 98K). Plus, the short stacks have the opportunity to make a run, and most importantly, there is something left to play for.

Am I missing something? Someone please speak up if this idea is idiotic.

Chief911
06-05-2005, 11:43 PM
These guys are a bunch of Jopkers.

Haggling over $100?

Jopke Jopke Jopke.

Nick

redsoxsox
06-05-2005, 11:43 PM
Why is mad upset over $100.

Joshssj4
06-05-2005, 11:45 PM
Real question is Buzz was just in the same situation as Casino whining over a little money and when he didn't get it he says game on. Now he put someone else into that situation and shows absolutely no leniancy nor mercy considering he was just in that position, personally I think he should cough up some money.

bogey
06-05-2005, 11:47 PM
they do that sometimes, i agree its better and they shoudl do it more often

redsoxsox
06-05-2005, 11:48 PM
Wow Buzz completly ran that final table. HE ended up qith an extra 15k in 1min of playing and an 1hr of discussion.