Loose table, on the board trips plus oesfd

[Tilt]

PL blinds .5, .5, 50 max

In the BB with Kc 6s 3s 5c

6 limpers, I check.

flop 3c 3d 4c

I check, LAG UTG bets 3, loose passive guy next to him calls, all fold back to me.

I pot it for like 10 more, they fold.

Should I have milked this more? I put the LP guy on a 3 + who knows what else...and i wanted to avoid having him stumble into the FH or bigger flush in a big pot.

[Acesover8s]

[ QUOTE ]
PL blinds .5, .5, 50 max

In the BB with Kc 6s 3s 5c

6 limpers, I check.

flop 3c 3d 4c

I check, LAG UTG bets 3, loose passive guy next to him calls, all fold back to me.

I pot it for like 10 more, they fold.

Should I have milked this more? I put the LP guy on a 3 + who knows what else...and i wanted to avoid having him stumble into the FH or bigger flush in a big pot.

[/ QUOTE ]

You should be happy with those results. If you come at this hand from a holdem perspective it looks like a monster, but in Omaha it is not. If played with you could easily be losing with possibly only 3 outs!

Even a hand like AcQc3sJs has you in pretty bad shape.

[kado]

i agree, i am pretty much against any type of slow play in omaha unless u flop q's or higher full house. to many people have to many outs to slow play a measily set of threes.

i might not raise it the pot with a strong hand like that, especially if you think your flush draw was good. but you can never complain about taking a pot down.

[bobman0330]

Another thing about slowplaying a read here a few months back:
In a PL game with deepish stacks, slowplaying is very rarely correct, even with a monster, because by failing to pump the pot now, you reduce your chance of getting paid off big later in the hand (because the bets will be smaller)

[Tilt]

Thanks for all your opinions. I still feel like I should have bet out less however. My read is that I was up against something lke this:

6s 3s Kc 5c 453 68.02 213 31.98 0 0.00 0.680
Js 2d Jh 3h 140 21.02 526 78.98 0 0.00 0.210
8s Qc Tc 8h 73 10.96 593 89.04 0 0.00 0.110

Which means pricing them in a bit more with my raise makes sense I believe. But I agree that I have to raise, just whether the full pot is a good idea I'm still unsure about.