stlip
06-02-2005, 10:33 AM
We've had a lot of stats posts lately from people who play too tight. For anyone who wants to compare those
or themselves with what things look like from a distinctly different approach I thought I'd share my Party 1/2 stats.
I know a lot of people will look at the aggression figures and their knee-jerk reaction will be that I
am too passive on the flop and not protecting my hands enough etc. But do take a closer look before
you bother to post that. I play more hands than the typical 2+2'er. Look at the percentage of actions on each street
and you'll see that I put in more bets or raises than a lot of people with solid aggressive games. But I also call
with some additional hands and these hands dilute the ag stats. I, of course, feel that these marginal
hands nonetheless win often enough that they are +EV, but this is the aspect of my game I have to watch
most closely and keep looking to refine.
All I can say is that through table selection or good reads or an extended period of running well (in these stats and
10,000+ hands before them)it works for me.
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y264/stlip/statsreviewI.jpg
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y264/stlip/statsreviewII.jpg
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y264/stlip/statsreviewIII.jpg
or themselves with what things look like from a distinctly different approach I thought I'd share my Party 1/2 stats.
I know a lot of people will look at the aggression figures and their knee-jerk reaction will be that I
am too passive on the flop and not protecting my hands enough etc. But do take a closer look before
you bother to post that. I play more hands than the typical 2+2'er. Look at the percentage of actions on each street
and you'll see that I put in more bets or raises than a lot of people with solid aggressive games. But I also call
with some additional hands and these hands dilute the ag stats. I, of course, feel that these marginal
hands nonetheless win often enough that they are +EV, but this is the aspect of my game I have to watch
most closely and keep looking to refine.
All I can say is that through table selection or good reads or an extended period of running well (in these stats and
10,000+ hands before them)it works for me.
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y264/stlip/statsreviewI.jpg
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y264/stlip/statsreviewII.jpg
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y264/stlip/statsreviewIII.jpg