May's results

[Zelcious]

May's results while 8-tabling the 20+2

655 tournies
3150$ profit + 330$ in rakeback
22% ROI
41% ITM

14% First
12% Second
15% Third
15% Fourth

All tournies have been played in sets. If I go out very early in a tournament I sometimes add a new one.
Care to share yours ?

[Voltron87]

Pssshhh... one month? I post stats after a week. /images/graemlins/grin.gif

Your stats look good, 22% ROI over 655 games is solid, and your itm is plump.

If I were you I would try to start playing continuously, that can be a big boost to your earn, give it a shot. but otherwise, congrats, you have been winning a significant amount of money and are a winning player.

[igotBlackJak]

i would post mine.. but they are not as cool as those numbers...

rakeback > noobs though

[FatalError]

1st 99 $49,500.00 12.41
2nd 117 $35,100.00 14.66
3rd 114 $22,800.00 14.29
4th 91 11.40
5th 90 11.28
6th 90 11.28
7th 92 11.53
8th 49 6.14
9th 36 4.51
10th 20 2.51

Totals 798 $107,400.00

Total Entries $86,982.00
ITM 41.35%
ROI 23.47%


This is for 109's, i got about 2500 in rakeback

[Karak567]

What is your 8-table setup like?

[Scuba Chuck]

Damn, Fatal. Those are worth boasting. Nice job.

[Al P]

Only $24,000 profit for the month?

When are you going to step out of the kiddie pool /images/graemlins/grin.gif

[Ogre]

move up to 30s

[TruFloridaGator]

Sweetness. I love you.

[J-Lo]

Well, here is this months' stats

according to spreadsheet:
650 $33's 8 tabling, ROI 8.9% =1909
450 $55's 4 tabling ROI 8.9% =2202

Net total= 4111 + rakeback...

However! I looked at my SNG spreadsheet, and the NET total was veyr different, i dont' know why. someone help!

My PT stats are as follows

514 $33's @ 9.13% ROI= 1548
312 $55's @ 4.31% ROI= 740

net= 2288+ rakeback

I think i believe the PT stats more than the spread sheet stats, because even though they might be understated-- i understand that PT would have a hard time messin up.

The last 400 SNG's i played at the $33's level, i broke even, w/ a downswing of over 22 buyins. So, i moved up to the $55's. The last 100 $55's i've played i've dropped 20 buyins. I think I might need some work, OR this is one of those bad swings which everyone is "supposed" to have.

[TruFloridaGator]

You're looking at the SNG Profit field on the spreadsheet right? Double check to make sure all SNGs in PT are accounted for in Spreadsheet?

[J-Lo]

the ROI % and profit don't match up w/ the # of tourneys played in the SNG spreadsheet.

but the difference between # of SnG's played between PT and SnG spreadsheet is that i played a few hundred of each april. And in those few hundred i made a couple thousand dollars, that's why there is a discrepincy between $ made in this month between PT and SNG spreadsheet.

[Zelcious]

That is some really nice results !!!

[Zelcious]

I presume you're talking to me even though you replied to "Al P". Yes I will start to mix in some 30+3 by the start of june. I see no reason why I shouldn't be able to make the same results at 30+3. I have 4-tabled the 30+3 previously with good profits.

[Myst]

Ah Zelcious, I knew your name looked familiar. I opened push on the bubble with 82o on your blind... unfortunately, somebody woke up with TT. Ah, so close!

[Zelcious]

I woulda called with 83o too /images/graemlins/smile.gif When was this ? last night ?
I don't remember the hand, must have had many tables on the bubble. Wait I'm vaguely recall something... were you the shortstack ?

[curtains]

Do not play continously, unless you enjoy the feeling that you are slowly dying.

[Degen]

[ QUOTE ]

Do not play continously, unless you enjoy the feeling that you are slowly dying.

[/ QUOTE ]

i dunno about the slowly dying part but i keep reading here that it is better and i keep trying and everytime i suck balls at it. dunno if its just me

Andre

[curtains]

Even though I should theoretically make more money by playing continuous, Im almost sure that due to my mindset I would make less, and would play poker a lot less if I tried to do this.

[Myst]

Yeah, I was the shorstack. Only because of this hand:


#Game No : 2135357556
***** Hand History for Game 2135357556 *****
NL Hold'em $20 Buy-in + $2 Entry Fee Trny:12698434 Level:5 Blinds(100/200) - Tuesday, May 31, 19:11:38 EDT 2005
Table Table 13886 (Real Money)
Seat 8 is the button
Total number of players : 5
Seat 2: b_rad__p ( $2405 )
Seat 3: WPTpro6969 ( $1937 )
Seat 6: Zelcious2 ( $1724 )
Seat 8: Mystraised ( $1308 )
Seat 9: CashBuilder ( $626 )
Trny:12698434 Level:5
Blinds(100/200)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to Mystraised [ Qc Qs ]
>You have options at Table 13941 Table!.
WPTpro6969 folds.
Zelcious2 raises [500].
>You have options at Table 14925 Table!.
Mystraised is all-In [1308]
CashBuilder is all-In [526]
b_rad__p folds.
Zelcious2 folds.
** Dealing Flop ** [ 2h, 8c, As ]
** Dealing Turn ** [ 9h ]
** Dealing River ** [ Ah ]
CashBuilder shows [ 8s, 8d ] a full house, Eights full of aces.
Mystraised shows [ Qc, Qs ] two pairs, aces and queens.
Mystraised wins 682 chips from side pot #1 with two pairs, aces and queens.
CashBuilder wins 1952 chips from the main pot with a full house, Eights full of aces.


Btw, why did you just raise only 500 instead of open pushing? Im guessing you didnt have aces or kings, b/c otherwise you wouldnt have folded. If you had a borderline hand, (AJ, AT), I think the best play is to push to increase folding equity.

[Myst]

I think people who play continuously have to have tremendous focus in order to not lose any ROI. For me and Messy_Jesse, we need to play in sets, because it gives the brain the necessary chance to reset and be fresh for the next tournaments we start up.

[curtains]

[ QUOTE ]
I think people who play continuously have to have tremendous focus in order to not lose any ROI. For me and Messy_Jesse, we need to play in sets, because it gives the brain the necessary chance to reset and be fresh for the next tournaments we start up.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes same for me. Often I eat in between sets, or watch a little tv or play video games. Also I can relax during the first 10-20 minutes of the set because the first 2 rounds are usually not very hectic.

[Degen]

ya great point man...its a personality difference

a big part of why i can play so often and not go nuts is because im doing all this other stuff for the first 4 lvls...then i play the buubble and take a break.

Andre

[Zelcious]

I guess I had a very marginal hand. Perhaps just junk. Don't remember. I'm not a fan of my play here but I don't think it's terrible either. Most of the time I will steal the blinds and if they call I can often steal the pot on the flop. On the other side 500 is a pretty big part of my stack. The good part is that I still have some FE if I fold this hand. Another aspect is that I try to mix up my game by sometimes push all in and sometimes raise, that usually confuses many opponents. They can't figure out if I only raise because I'm weak of because I want action.

[dfscott]

[ QUOTE ]
I think people who play continuously have to have tremendous focus in order to not lose any ROI. For me and Messy_Jesse, we need to play in sets, because it gives the brain the necessary chance to reset and be fresh for the next tournaments we start up.

[/ QUOTE ]

I do a combination. I only 4-table, and I don't play nearly as many tourneys/day as most of the people here -- only about a dozen or so. I usually run continuous for my first 8-10. Then, I take a break for about 15 min before cranking up a 4-table nightcap.

But I'm old and decrepit, so this may not be optimal for most people...

[ripped]

gg, nh, pwned, goodbye and I love you.

[pooh74]

Scott,

You still playing turbos at stars? (or am I confused?)

Im same as you...old, decrepit, 12 a day, 4 tabler...

[swarm]

Almost all two tabeling as I am 100% on the road for work...

228 55's =

Profit of 4100
ROI 30.5%

Rakeback 300

Total Gain for Month of May =4400

[dfscott]

I had originally planned to continue playing the Turbos, but I switched back to party once I realized how hard it was to find enough games to multi-table effectively above the the 27s. Plus, there's a gap between the 27s and 60s (the 38s aren't Turbos, they're regular speed 6-max). And while that extra player doesn't seem like much, that dead money can make a bigger difference in your bottom line than you might think. But the main reason I switched was my frustration with the 33s -- I had started playing scared.

The switch did it's job (restoring my confidence) and I think I've gotten things back together. I'm now beating the 33s at a comfortable rate (and actually considering taking some shots at the 55s).

There's no place like Party.... there's no place like Party...

[dfscott]

May was a rough month for me -- the 33s gave me a lot of trouble:

52 22s @ 18% ROI = $214.00
30 27s @ 25% ROI = $202.50
158 33s @ 3% ROI = $156.00

$572 + $116 rakeback = $688 (hey, at least it's positive)

[ReDeYES88]

It's been a slow month, very busy at my real job (yes, a real job /images/graemlins/grin.gif), and also putting some sweat equity into the house. I also play in sets and will add a new one if I bust early.

Started the month by 2-tabling the 33s

31 tournies
58% ROI
48% ITM
10.5 hours @ $57/hour

23% First
10% Second
16% Third
9% Fourth
26% Fifth

Then I switched to 4-tabling the 22s (popping my 4-tabling cherry)

141 tournies
37% ROI
48% ITM
25.6 hours @ $45/hour

14% First
16% Second
18% Third
16% Fourth
11% Fifth

A little slow to catch on at first and I was missing many opportunities to steal and/or be aggressive 5 & 4 handed. Slowing working on that and the finishes are moving more toward first.

Profit= $597 (33s) + $1158 (22s) = $1755 + $95 rakeback

[Sponger15SB]

$22 SNG RESULTS
not sure how many I played, or how much I made

$33 SNG RESULTS
150 SNGS .... -$450


I really should start keeping better records. /images/graemlins/grin.gif

[bluefeet]

3rd month since leaving PP for the 6-seaters on PS...semi-moving up from the 13's to the 38's:

216 sngs (116 13's, 100 38's)
43.5 ITM
24.7 ROI
43 1sts
51 2nds
+1,297

...these suckers are pretty top-heavy (65/35%), i really need to spend more time in the HU forum.

if i can just get my daughter to drop out of college, i'd have enough BR to stay on the 38's /images/graemlins/wink.gif

[for those that have considered the 6-seaters, i'm getting close to my 1st 500 since march - 467 total. flat-lining a 43.5 ITM, 23.9 ROI. 45min average in duration...but the consistancy in the numbers reflect the rewards for basic tight/aggressive strategy. oh, and IMO there has been absolutely ZERO difference bewteen the 13's & 38's, if you've played these and are considering moving up]

[Myst]

May was pretty dismal for me. Didnt play for about 10 days as I made the transition from living at the dorms to getting my summer residence up. Nevertheless, these numbers make me wanna puke, as a reflect on the shitty month that was May.

$20s
264 played
ROI: 13.6%
ITM: 37.5%
Profit= $792

$33s
78 played
ROI: -.02%
ITM: 32.1%
Profit: - $54

$55s
330 played
ROI: -1.1%
ITM: 33%
Profit: $-180.00

Overall Stats:
Tournaments Played: 672
Profit: $558
Rakeback: $603
Overall Profit: $1161

Too lazy to calculate overall ROI, but you can see I made about .80 cents per tournament. Woohoo for minimum wage (and thank god for rakeback)!

[Shillx]

Started playing the Party $22's full time on 5/22

203 Played
18.67% ROI
38.92% ITM
13%/14%/12% 1st/2nd/3rd
+$834 for this part of the month (Don't get rakeback)

Damn these things are awesome. I played them when I first started a few years back and then stopped to play LHE. Wish I hadn't. Thanks for the great advice everyone.

Brad

[Zelcious]

Get rakeback now ! You're missing out on a lot of profit.

[pergesu]

[ QUOTE ]
Get rakeback now ! You're missing out on a lot of profit.

[/ QUOTE ]
$101.50, in fact

[dmmikkel]

I was busy with exams and stuff and only started 4-tabling 109s in the end of the month, but anyway, here are my results

1st 10.6% 14
2nd 15.9% 21
3rd 14.4% 19
4th 12.9% 17
5th 12.1% 16
6th 10.6% 14
7th 9.8% 13
8th 7.6% 10
9th 4.5% 6
10th 1.5% 2

Total entries $14,388.00
Total prizes $17,100.00
SNG Profit $2,712.00

ROI 18.8%
ITM 40.9%

[curtains]

May results based on 8 tabling and playing 32 per day while slowly working my way up through the ranks:


4 $215s: +740 (just started adding $215s to the 8 tabling mix)

415 $109s: +8,365 - 18.49 ROI

318 $55s: +3,910 - 22.36 ROI

55 $33s: +1,095 - 60.33 ROI


Total: 792 tourneys: +14,110 - 21.57 ROI


* There are less than it would seem for playing 32 tourneys per day since my internet was dead for about a week early in the month

[microbet]

It's probably pretty rare for one person to play a similar number of games in such a short period of time at so many different buyins.

You are probably in a nearly unique position to make comments on the differences in play and required strategy adjustments across buyins.

If you do it, I'll send you a cookie.

[Unarmed]

Me too please please. I want to move up to the 109s but I'm scared of sharks like curtains taking all my cheddah.

[curtains]

IMO the biggest adjustment comes when you jump from $55 to $109s. There are simply more regulars, pros and people whom you can't just have to give respect a lot more often. However there are still plenty of idiots. (Im lying the biggest adjustment is from $109 to $215, but I figure that's obvious).

Of course $33 to $55 is a big adjustment too if only because of the starting chips. My results were actually much better at the $55s (27 ROI compared to 20 ROI overall), but I attribute this to random chance and the fact that my game improved as I played more and more sets. I was actually playing quite poorly my first 100-200 of 8 tabling.

I had very similar results in the $22s+$33s, however I felt that the $33s were stronger, just my results didn't tell me this, but it was only based on like 250 $22s and 500 $33s.

[curtains]

One other thing, I remember a bunch of people posting that you can't beat the $109s with the same startegy to use to beat the $55s. I basically use the exact same strategy, except maybe some small differences preflop early, and it's working fine (although it's very possible I can't keep up with 18% ROI, but doesn't matter since I'm moving to $215s now) and will continue to work fine. I know my sample size is not that large, but I have enough experience to just realize that my opponent's are playing worse than me in almost all situations. Even the regulars who you see 4 and 8 tabling, make some clear mistakes IMO, although they generally seem good enough to have an ROI in the 10-20% range.

(Almost all of the mistakes being that their calling standards are too tight, and I notice this most once I get headsup with one of the $109 pros.)

To give an example of a hand I had at the $109's that might get criticized...

Blinds were like 250-500, and I had 4700 in chips. The SB moved allin, and I called with JTh. Basically it's marginally -EV against someone with a tighter pushing range there than optimal. However its hugely +EV against someone who is pushing any 2, or +EV against someone who is as loose as they should be. I highly doubt that most people are calling there however, and I admit it's probably marginal, but you simply cannot allow people to get away with doing crap like pushing any 2 cards there.

[microbet]

Thanks. Let me know where you want me to send the cookie.

[curtains]

What kind of cookie? I'd prefer chocolate chip if at all possible.

[MentalCombat]

[ QUOTE ]

What kind of cookie? I'd prefer chocolate chip if at all possible.

[/ QUOTE ]

Peanut butter is a better choice for max ROI

[curtains]

Peanut butter is a huge joke, you've got to be kidding me?

[citanul]

[ QUOTE ]
(Almost all of the mistakes being that their calling standards are too tight, and I notice this most once I get headsup with one of the $109 pros.)

To give an example of a hand I had at the $109's that might get criticized...

Blinds were like 250-500, and I had 4700 in chips. The SB moved allin, and I called with JTh. Basically it's marginally -EV against someone with a tighter pushing range there than optimal. However its hugely +EV against someone who is pushing any 2, or +EV against someone who is as loose as they should be. I highly doubt that most people are calling there however, and I admit it's probably marginal, but you simply cannot allow people to get away with doing crap like pushing any 2 cards there.

[/ QUOTE ]

eyo,

first off, that hand doesn't show someone else's calling range being too tight, or whatever, it's just showing that you think you made a good play because they push too loose.

i'm personally not too schway with that call there, though against an aggressive opp, it's probably only marginally bad. if the standard person is, as you say, too tight, wouldn't a better strategy be to fold and wait til you can properly call, while stealing from them constantly?

citanul

[dfscott]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

What kind of cookie? I'd prefer chocolate chip if at all possible.

[/ QUOTE ]

Peanut butter is a better choice for max ROI

[/ QUOTE ]

No way - you need something with NUTS!

[MentalCombat]

[ QUOTE ]

Peanut butter is a huge joke, you've got to be kidding me?

[/ QUOTE ]

Protien from the peanuts fuels the muscles, makes you a better bully, resulting in a higher FE.

Duh Noob.

[citanul]

neiman marcus cookies are the only acceptable choice, unless someone has the recipe for the girlscout cookie known as samoas.

[curtains]

Against the following pushing range its +.1 to call:

22+,A2+,K2+,Q2s+,Q6o+,J7s+,J9o+,T8s+,98s


I had the feeling that my opponent was a solid player and would be looser than this pushing. I was correct when they turned over T5o. This means there was a decent chance they are pushing any 2 or at least a large % of their hands, in which case folding is utterly absurd.

Everytime you make a fold like this against someone pushing any 2, you are being exploited worse than you can imagine. It's +2.4% to call against any 2 in a situation where you are playing for only 20% EV. Meanwhile we are on a forum where a large majority of people suggest to push any 2 every hand once the blinds are this high, which leads me to suggest that others are doing so as well.

Meanwhile when you happen to be up against someone with a too tight range like: 22+,A2s+,A3o+,KTs+,KJo+,QJs
you are only -.5% EV, and honestly I felt this guy would be signifigantly looser based on some factors, not to mention one of them being that they pushed the very first hand headsup.

[citanul]

cool. thanks for the writeup. i'll have to go do some more looking at hands like JTs in particular for heads up situations.

i'm serious about the NM cookies btw.

citanul

[curtains]

It's okay I don't think that folding is bad or anything, I just don't like being exploited by the push monkeys.

[Madd]

My last 700 tournies for those who think the 50s are softer than the 30s:

500 30+3$
1 84
2 44
3 62
4 54
5 66
6 62
7 50
8 37
9 26
10 15

ROI +23%
+3780$

200 50+5$
1 16
2 22
3 25
4 33
5 25
6 21
7 21
8 17
9 11
10 9

ROI -11%
-1200$

[citanul]

My only problem with this reasoning is that you're not "not letting yourself get exploited," really. I dunno, I mean, against someoen who's very loose, yeah, again, I didn't realize how good JTs really was here, but if the guy is very loose from the button and too tight from the sb, why not wait til you're farther ahead of his range? (I'm not sure what beyond the obvious is farther ahead or anything, but still.)

I'm having trouble following a bit of the logic is all. Why not do: He's over aggressive, but also likely too tight, so let him hang himself for real, while you keep pace from the button?

citanul

[microbet]

Any type or brand of cookie within reason, so no Saffron cookies with 24k gold flake or no home-made cookies from your Aunt Beulah, and I'm sorry to say, no "medicinal" cookies.

[rsq]

Where do you track those stats - on your own or with a program?

thx

[curtains]

I am letting myself get exploited if he pushes any 2 and has a proper calling range. Once again I often ignore details such as exploiting my opponent's mistakes, and this can be debatable. Firstly I always try to make sure that they can't exploit me by just pushing and knowing I will fold too many hands. If I fold hands like JTs my opponents are now correct to push any 2 cards on me I believe. I don't want to make this correct for them, especially when you face the same players often like you do at the higher buyins.

Anyway it's harder to get a hand much better than JTs in the BB facing an allin against any 2 cards or a very loose range.

Basically I try to make the mathematically best play based on the current hand, without taking into account the assumption that I will be able to crush them in future hands, because everytime someone takes this approach with me, they are basically giving me money because my calling range will not be as tight as theyd hope.

[Unarmed]

Curtains, against a SB push monkey do you ever pass on a slightly +EV call HU so that you can make a greater +EV call in the future, or are blinds eating you too quickly to even consider that?

[curtains]

[ QUOTE ]
Curtains, against a SB push monkey do you ever pass on a slightly +EV call HU so that you can make a greater +EV call in the future, or are blinds eating you too quickly to even consider that?

[/ QUOTE ]

I take the +Ev call immediately /images/graemlins/smile.gif

btw one other reason why I feel that my ITM strategy is correct is my overwhelming number of 1st place finishes compared to 2nd. I have something like 57% 1st places after it gets to headsup, over my 1600 tourneys since I started 8 tabling the sit and go's. I suspect some of this is due to luck, but when I hear about players who have like 48%-51%, I have to suspect I'm doing something right.

Note I have done no studies letting me know whether I start headsup with a chip advantage or not, as I'm too lazy, but I think that 57% is pretty high?

Anyway it's pointless, my sample size is still too small to make any concrete conclusions.

[citanul]

doh, i had forgotten that your motto is not always mine:

Man these guys stink, I'll pee in their ear for the variety of ways that they stink. And not just at poker, at life too.

yours is the Bill Filmaffian:

Play perfect poker. Play perfect poker.

or something.

citanul

ps: haha, i said fillmaffian.

[Blarg]

[ QUOTE ]

Even though I should theoretically make more money by playing continuous, Im almost sure that due to my mindset I would make less, and would play poker a lot less if I tried to do this.

[/ QUOTE ]

Considering it feels to you like slowly dying, I'd guess you were correct!

[Blarg]

[ QUOTE ]
I had originally planned to continue playing the Turbos, but I switched back to party once I realized how hard it was to find enough games to multi-table effectively above the the 27s. Plus, there's a gap between the 27s and 60s (the 38s aren't Turbos, they're regular speed 6-max). And while that extra player doesn't seem like much, that dead money can make a bigger difference in your bottom line than you might think. But the main reason I switched was my frustration with the 33s -- I had started playing scared.

The switch did it's job (restoring my confidence) and I think I've gotten things back together. I'm now beating the 33s at a comfortable rate (and actually considering taking some shots at the 55s).

There's no place like Party.... there's no place like Party...

[/ QUOTE ]

Hey, grats. Nice to year you've coming out of that bad streak.

[KingDan]

162 tournaments at the 33 -162 (prerakeback), -3.06 ROI, 29% finish ITM AVG finish 4.8, 22 first, 11 seconds, 14 thirds.

I am happy with only -3 ROI because i had a really nasty run of cards in there. My amount of first in comparison to second/thirds I know is exaggerated because of the very small sample size... but I think overall it resembles the fact in most borderline situations, I tend to push.

[1C5]

How do you know your ROI if Eurobet doesn't send you HH? Or do they send them in some strange format?

[DonButtons]

played almost 700 $109s, but I had a real lazy month, completely skipped the first 2 weeks, because of finals and coming back home from school, and then I was sick 1 week, but still managed almost 700 haha...

my goal was to just make enough in may to cover my new computer/monitor set up and a nice 42in plasma tv for the wall...

ended the month at around 8.5% roi, so with rake back, it was like a +$8k month...

[curtains]

They do send them! Just click on E-Messages, but also for those times when you don't get them for whatever reason, you can just import them manually.

[1C5]

But they are not in your email, just in your "e-messages" so how do you find ROI? Do you copy and past every one into PT or what?

[Myst]

Probably just variance, but yes, the 50s are tougher than the 30s.

[Nick M]

Protein harder to digest...results in shorter session length...i go with coffee and DD preferably Chocolate Glazed.

[curtains]

I click on the file, do save link as and then import them into pokertracker. I've never actually done the automatic importing...I was going to learn how but once I started using eurobet I decided there was no point.

[Bigwig]

I don't have them handy. But my May stats look something like this:

$50s 0% ROI
$30s 38% ROI

Unfortunately, I played more $50s than $30s.

I'm pissed off lately.

[Voltron87]

stats are evil. they make me feel good when I'm on a heater and make me feel way worse than I should when Im breaking even. they kill my zen.

[wuwei]

[ QUOTE ]
My last 700 tournies for those who think the 50s are softer than the 30s:

500 30+3$
1 84
2 44
3 62
4 54
5 66
6 62
7 50
8 37
9 26
10 15

ROI +23%
+3780$

200 50+5$
1 16
2 22
3 25
4 33
5 25
6 21
7 21
8 17
9 11
10 9

ROI -11%
-1200$

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't have my stats in front of me, but they look roughly like this:

30+3, 200 tournies, ROI = 3%

50+5, 100 tournies, ROI = 55%

Clearly the 50s are easier...

[ferb]

Well only managed 104 for the month 3 and 4tabling.

1 22
2 12
3 13
4 17
5 12
6 9
7 10
8 4
9 3
10 2

ITM 45.19
ROI 50.35
+2880.00

good run.cheers.

[Moonsugar]

This is my 1st month of playing SnGs again after a long hiatus of about 18 months.

I played 33s, 55s, 109s and 215s. I won $6,648. My two worst limits were 33 and 215. Broke even on 33 and had an astounding -35% ROI on the 215s. I finished 4th in 25% of my 215s! Also closed the month by having a 20 buy in downswing on the 109s on 5/31 after some bad luck and bad play brought on by me tilting after I somehow caught the attention of an online stalker. /images/graemlins/frown.gif

Overall I am pleased with my first month back. I was profitable and I learned a lot. I still have a lot of weaknesses, but have corrected some and identified others I need to work on.

[AbelM]

I've been keeping track for exactly 45 days now, i play the 215's.

Number of SNG's: 562
ROI: 17,85%
ITM: 37,37%

I am pretty happy.

[dmmikkel]

Wow, nice results..

How do you compare 215s to 109s? or anyone else for that matter.

[MentalCombat]

[ QUOTE ]
I've been keeping track for exactly 45 days now, i play the 215's.

Number of SNG's: 562
ROI: 17,85%
ITM: 37,37%

I am pretty happy.

[/ QUOTE ]

With good reason! 21k aint bad for 1.5 months of playing poker.

[AbelM]

I have no idea to be honest, i barely played the 109's.

Wow, that was usefull /images/graemlins/cool.gif