View Full Version : what am i doing wrong that i am losing
3bb/100 at $1/2 on stars
VPIP 20.68
VPIP (SB) 32.57
W$WSF 33.78
Went to SD 38
Won at SD 46.78
PF Raise 8.77
any thoughts
diebitter
05-31-2005, 08:26 AM
Do you mean you're losing 3BB/100? Otherwise you're winning, and don't understand the issue...
How many hands is it, BTW? Any idea what your aggression factor is (if you use PokerTracker)?
I ask because I have very similar stats - I'm a TAA in pokertracer, and I'm down about -5BB/100 in the last 1K hands on party 1/2 - it's just the cards - I keep getting suckouts, Aces hitting on the river and there's a donk sitting to the end with Ax, draws not hitting etc etc - it's just variance, and I'm not too worried about this, cos it's not good to worry about short-term results - just worry about making sure you're playing right - which your stats indicate you are.
I am down 3bb/100 after crushing 0.5/1 for 3.75bb/100
i am at 3k hands 1/2 (down about 200)
my AF is .77 including flop and 1.33 w/o flop.
Am i not adapting my game properly for the higher limit???
Honestly these numbers won't tell us very much. You need to keep posting hands (like you've been doing) and also contribute to threads by giving your opinion.
MrEngenic
05-31-2005, 10:12 AM
You have a very low Won at SD, it's only 46 and it should be around 52-54, and you have a high went to SD. This probably means that you are running bad or that you call down with marginal hands too much. The pots are smaller and often shorthanded on 1/2, so you need to change your standards what you call down with compared to 0.5/1. Start folding to the turn raise/check raise more often, I had the same problem in the beginning.
I play tighter than you, do you call with low pockets and suited aces in EP? Doing that and limping first in with these hands in middle or late is a big mistake.
matt42s
05-31-2005, 10:24 AM
3k hands isnt really enough BUT your AF is waaay low.
It sounds like u might have picked up some weak tight tendencies.
You have PT? post the separate flop, turn and river AF's. (did u mean .77 including preflop?)
davelin
05-31-2005, 10:28 AM
Sample size yadda yadda. You also go to SD too much.
@bsolute_luck
05-31-2005, 10:52 AM
[ QUOTE ]
Sample size yadda yadda. You also go to SD too much.
[/ QUOTE ]
really? what is the approx range % that is preferred/suggested? (mine is higher right now, but around the same sample size)
Yeah i know the sample size is low but want to find out what possible leaks are out there. I dont want to lose 3bb/100 for 10k hands just to validate what i may have had insight to at 3k.
So it looks like I am showing down to much I will try to post some hands where this may have been the case.
What should the %SD be?
vulturesrow
05-31-2005, 11:06 AM
[ QUOTE ]
What should the %SD be?
[/ QUOTE ]
Read the microlimit FAQ.
davelin
05-31-2005, 11:12 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Sample size yadda yadda. You also go to SD too much.
[/ QUOTE ]
really? what is the approx range % that is preferred/suggested? (mine is higher right now, but around the same sample size)
[/ QUOTE ]
The standard seems to be around 28-32. You could probably get away with something like 34-35. Full ring I think anything above this is a red flag.
Wetdog
05-31-2005, 01:14 PM
When I was running bad I had to review what habits I had that was hurting my results. The first thing I began cutting out was calling everything down even if I thought I was beaten. I didn't want to be shut out of a good sized pot for one bet. It didn't occur to me that it was often 2,3 or 4 bets that I was spewing along the way. Reviewing SSHE hand quizzes helped me recognize marginal hands that I formerly thought were strong.
Next was being way more selective in completing and calling in the blinds. Not being able to use PokerTracker (until now), I relied on stats like % flops seen, % won of flops seen and % won at showdown that the sites give. Keeping the % of flops seen (different than VP$IP because it includes blinds checked and shorthanded tables causing more blinds) down is tough to monitor because it is over a small sample, but results are quantified in the other stats.
Watch out for small and middle suited connectors in EP. They just sucked the life out of sessions where I was up marginally.
I suck at closing statements, so I hope these ideas that helped me help you too.
Jaran
05-31-2005, 01:32 PM
Obviously what you're doing wrong is losing too many hands.
Seriously, just continue to post hands. Stats (for me, at least) are a nice way to check if I'm making some large error, like VP$P of 35% or something, but don't really show why I'm in a downswing. Analysing the hands where I think things went wrong is much more valuable, IMHO.
-Jaran
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.