AK, 3rd hand of a 20 + 2 in the fishy hour, re-raised all in, call? PF

[Karak567]

***** Hand History for Game 2125380722 *****
NL Hold'em $20 Buy-in + $2 Entry Fee Trny:12641335 Level:1 Blinds(10/15) - Sunday, May 29, 19:29:50 EDT 2005
Table Table 13778 (Real Money)
Seat 10 is the button
Total number of players : 10
Seat 1: mmmmccc ( $770 )
Seat 2: wcaines ( $800 )
Seat 3: kmbst53 ( $935 )
Seat 4: jchog333 ( $800 )
Seat 5: sepher28 ( $800 )
Seat 6: SENDMYCHECK ( $770 )
Seat 7: bedav12 ( $797 )
Seat 8: amberick ( $790 )
Seat 9: fredvargas ( $735 )
Seat 10: MunEGrubber ( $803 )
Trny:12641335 Level:1
Blinds(10/15)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to sepher28 [ As Kd ]
kmbst53 folds.
jchog333 folds.
sepher28 raises [60].
SENDMYCHECK folds.
bedav12 folds.
amberick folds.
fredvargas is all-In [735]
MunEGrubber folds.
mmmmccc folds.
wcaines folds.

[johnnybeef]

as fishy as the 22s are, the only hands id pay that price to play is aa and kk

[Eric Draven]

Go with your gut here. Based on my 10+1 play, n00bs play AA-KK the same as they do QJs and everything in between. Assuming he has no clue what is going on (as I do) it's hard to tell. At the 10+1 I usually call due to the number of times I see KJo and A2 (sooted of course)... 20+2 there's less of it, so I'm not sure if it's as profitable or not in your case.

[lastchance]

I don't give my opponents enough credit to lay this down. There are two types of opponents here, those who push just AA/KK because other people suck, or those who just suck.

I expect the latter to be much more numerous.