"Five-our of spades."

[fyodor]

What is this supposed to be? I understand the concept being discussed, and it doesn't affect it's telling; I'm just wondering what this typo was really supposed to be.

[Stork]

five-*four* of spades. I was confused too until I read the next paragraph down.

[fyodor]

Well that's certainly the most obvious and what I would have guessed but the 5/images/graemlins/spade.gif is on Lester's board. I also see no reason why anyone would think DS had specifically spades in any event as his board is /images/graemlins/spade.gif /images/graemlins/club.gif /images/graemlins/heart.gif

[Brainwalter]

But his door was a spade, and it's more likely he would have started suited than backed into a flushdraw. (I don't know what it means anymore though, since the 4 /images/graemlins/spade.gif is on Lester's board).

[fyodor]

maybe he meant 5,4 or spades but I still don't see anyone putting him on a flush draw as he would only have 3 suited at this point.

[poker-penguin]

5 /images/graemlins/spade.gif ? /images/graemlins/confused.gif

Sklansky /images/graemlins/blush.gif ?

[jedi]

I'm still concerned about the two 3 /images/graemlins/heart.gif that seem to be in this deck. Live poker is rigged.

[stabn]

[ QUOTE ]
I'm still concerned about the two 3 /images/graemlins/heart.gif that seem to be in this deck. Live poker is rigged.

[/ QUOTE ]

The whole article was disjointed and poorly done. It did not flow from point to point well, and i think several of his points were not made. This was a very ameturish effort by DS /images/graemlins/frown.gif.

[fyodor]

lol missed that 3/images/graemlins/heart.gif thing. Anyhow I don't agree with the following poster about it being disjointed; I found it pretty easy to follow and instructive - just like to know what the boards really were on this first part.

[David Sklansky]

It was five four of spades. Shouldn't have been in other hands.