insignificant statistical oddity

[Gamblor]

29,000 hands into a new PT database I'm still losing 0.5 BB/100 with AKs.

Maybe I need to play in games with less fish.

[DcifrThs]

[ QUOTE ]
29,000 hands into a new PT database I'm still losing 0.5 BB/100 with AKs.

Maybe I need to play in games with less fish.

[/ QUOTE ]

well you didn't include the # times you got AKs...

-Barron

[haakee]

I'm going to guess about 87. And that's not a big enough sample size to guarantee a win.

[Gamblor]

And that's not a big enough sample size to guarantee a win.

Hence "insignificant" and "oddity".

71 times.

I just never had a premium hand lose for this long.

mid pairs etc. i understand would take longer to reach either side of zero, but i didn't anticipate losing this long with AKs.

FWIW, it's 15-30 party. and i've been running very well over these hands.

[MaxPower]

You never heard of the new pokertracker database curse?

[ACPlayer]

Maybe I need to play in games with less fish.

Good one, indeed!!