instacall?

[tomdemaine]

***** Hand History for Game 2084889591 *****
NL Hold'em $20 Buy-in + $2 Entry Fee Trny:12411601 Level:9 Blinds(300/600) - Saturday, May 21, 21:04:17 EDT 2005
Table Table 13775 (Real Money)
Seat 5 is the button
Total number of players : 4
Seat 5: Reed27 ( $1375 )
Seat 8: rbminn ( $4105 )
Seat 9: bill_fillmaff ( $1240 )
Seat 2: klm45 ( $1280 )
Trny:12411601 Level:9
Blinds(300/600)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to bill_fillmaff [ 3h 3s ]
klm45 is all-In [1280]
Reed27 folds.
>You have options at Table 14011 Table!.
rbminn calls [980].
bill_fillmaff folds.
** Dealing Flop ** [ 8s, 7c, 6c ]
** Dealing Turn ** [ 8h ]
** Dealing River ** [ 8c ]

[oxymoron]

I'm instafolding the pocket 3's. Are you being serious?

[DasLeben]

[ QUOTE ]
I'm instafolding the pocket 3's. Are you being serious?

[/ QUOTE ]

Not me. With blinds 300/600, UTG should be pushing basically any two. You have 2xBB, which doesn't guarantee you much at all at this point. I gamble here, and hope UTG doesn't have a bigger pocket pair.

EDIT: I take that back. I didn't see that the player before had called the all-in. I fold as well. I hate reading raw HHs. /images/graemlins/tongue.gif

[Jimbobobb]

If nobody else had called, I'd almost instacall. With another calling in front, you're dodging 4 overs, or are way behind to a higher pocket pair. Folds McFolderson.


Edit: EXTREMELY good point made by microbet. If you have them both covered, I'd call as well and play for first.

[microbet]

This sucks, you need 41 more chips. Fold.

[microbet]

Yeah, if no one else called it is a clear call. I think it is a clear call if you have 41 more chips too.

[11t]

Terrible call

[tomdemaine]

not to be results oriented but...

klm45 shows [ Ks, Ah ] three of a kind, eights.
rbminn shows [ Td, Kc ] three of a kind, eights.
klm45 wins 3160 chips from the main pot with three of a kind, eights with ace kicker

[lastchance]

ouch.