ui vs. oooooooooooo

[creedofhubris]

I raise K/images/graemlins/spade.gifJ/images/graemlins/spade.gif preflop and end up showing it down.

Nick Dollar: And here you are, projecting this rock-tight Joey Knish image, and you raise with KJ.

Me: It was suited.

Nick Dollar: AK can be suited. AQ can be suited. KJ can only be soooooooooted.

[emil3000]

[ QUOTE ]
AK can be suited. AQ can be suited. KJ can only be soooooooooted.

[/ QUOTE ]

He's a fun guy.

[RoboRob]

What's your nick ID pokerroom?

[NickDollar]

Where you been lately homie? Missed my awesome +1200BB run this weekend. All my hands are boring though.... It's weird, whenever I get put to a decision for all my chips I have either top set or 5 high, I guess the poker gods don't want me to post anything at 2+2.

I remember that convo though, it was a good time. I propose this formula:

# of o's = 1 + ( 14 - top card numeric value ) * ( top card numeric value - bottom card numeric value )

KJ remains a mild sooted (I guess I initially overreacted), while 82 is a whopping sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooted.

[Ghazban]

[ QUOTE ]
Where you been lately homie? Missed my awesome +1200BB run this weekend. All my hands are boring though.... It's weird, whenever I get put to a decision for all my chips I have either top set or 5 high, I guess the poker gods don't want me to post anything at 2+2.

I remember that convo though, it was a good time. I propose this formula:

# of o's = 1 + ( 14 - top card numeric value ) * ( top card numeric value - bottom card numeric value )

KJ remains a mild sooted (I guess I initially overreacted), while 82 is a whopping sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooted.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm shocked that this formula hasn't yet been published in a bona fide 2+2 book. David and Mason have been holding back....

[creedofhubris]

My computer broke. I got a new one on order.