RocketManJames
05-16-2005, 07:22 AM
Thought about this the other night. I have a few questions after I describe it.
Prop Bet:
You have 1 year to work out in such a way that your right (upper) arm and your left (upper) leg are 80% larger than the other arm/leg. Everything will be measured in the fully-flexed state.
Questions:
1) Is this possible in a year?
2) If so, would it be easier for someone who starts off big all around, and allow one arm/leg to shrink and continue to work out the other arm/leg? Or, better to start off small so that the 80% difference isn't as huge in absolute terms?
3) How much would it take for you to try? (Assumes you think it is possible in the first place.)
-RMJ
Prop Bet:
You have 1 year to work out in such a way that your right (upper) arm and your left (upper) leg are 80% larger than the other arm/leg. Everything will be measured in the fully-flexed state.
Questions:
1) Is this possible in a year?
2) If so, would it be easier for someone who starts off big all around, and allow one arm/leg to shrink and continue to work out the other arm/leg? Or, better to start off small so that the 80% difference isn't as huge in absolute terms?
3) How much would it take for you to try? (Assumes you think it is possible in the first place.)
-RMJ