kahntrutahn
05-10-2005, 07:43 PM
Ok, a quick explanation of these numbers.
1) 3 different handles on 3 different party skins (my 3rd and final handle is using rakeback because I want to make money playing cards /images/graemlins/laugh.gif )
2) My original numbers were the BEST, Ive actually gone down in BB/100 since then, perhaps it was a fluke?
3) I multi-table 3-4 tables at a time; usually 4.
4) All stats are 2/4 limit at full ring @ Party & Skins.
Give me pretty much any comment you want to make given the numbers and the things I say with each set of numbers. I am thirsty for criticisms, encouragements, etc.
-----------------------------------------------------------
*** OVERALL STATS *** (3 diff IDs; aggregate numbers)
VP$IP = 20.1%
PFR% = 8.88%
BB/100= 1.91
*** First Handle @ PP ***
NOTES: I was playing after freshly reading SuperSystem 2 (Jennifer Harmon's Limit Play Section) and Phil Hellmuth's Play Poker Like The Pro's. I was playing more hands regardless of position, 3 betting small PP to single limper/raisers to isolate, hardly ever check-raised (0.64% of possible actions)and in general being more aggressive pre-flop & flop.
Sample Size = 15,122 hands
VP$IP = 22.81%
PFT% = 10.65%
BB/100= 2.46
AGF = 2.54
PT classification = SLA/A
WT SD = 33.47%
W$SD = 51.64%
*** 2nd Handle @ Empire ***
I had lost a bit of steam @ PP in the last 5k hands or so before I made this handle to clear a bonus and get a copy of PokerEdge (useless program to me now, I don't ever run it). I also wanted to start with a fresh name and a new game. I decided to pay more attention to position, stop 3 betting pre-flop with small/mid PP and some other general things I picked up reading around the net. I wanted to be TA/A which I heard was the best to be (not to mention noticed the TA/A at the tables were making a good bit).
Sample Size = 13,011 hands
VP$IP = 18.58%
PFR% = 8.1%
BB/100= 1.7
AGF = 2.74
PT Classification = TA/A
WT SD = 28.15%
W$SD = 56.85%
*** 3rd Handle @ Eurobet ***
Decided I wanted to take advantage of rakeback after seeing the amounts I was paying to the house were damn near what I was winning! I also purchased and read Small Stakes Hold'em after hearing so much about it here at 2+2 while lurking. Thus, my goal, was to be more selectively tight and really work on improving my game. I got off to a terrible -115 BB start in the first 3k hands and have since worked it back into the black. These stats are current.
Sample Size = 9,829 hands
VP$IP = 18.12%
PFR = 7.17%
BB/100= 1.28
AGF = 2.62
PT Classification = TA/A
WT SD = 28.77%
W$SD = 57.41%
-----------------------------------------------------------
I gave myself 4 months starting April 1st to learn Low Limit Poker which is about all I can afford before I have to actually use any of the money from the bankroll for living expenses. I live in a part of the country with low living expenses, thus, it isn't hard to subsist on ~1k a month given a certain lifestyle that I am accustomed to being a recent college grad. However, I would like to pull 50k/year+, which I hear is not unheard of w/ internet play and rakeback. I do not play much at the local casino's as they mostly offer 3/6/12, 10/20, and 1/3 NL. I figure I might try the 10/20 out when I move up, and start doing well (2+ bb/100) in the 3/6 online games.
Originally I planned to stick to 2/4 until I was crushing them @ 3BB/100 with 100k+ hand sampling before moving up? What do you think of this plan? Is that too lofty a goal? Is it even acheivable/sustainable? Should I simply hit and sustain 2BB/100 and then move up to 3/6? ** I've dabbled in 3/6 but w/2k hands Im not ready to post those numbers as I don't think they have any statistical significance. **
Anyway, any comments, criticisms, reccomendations, etc are appreciated.
1) 3 different handles on 3 different party skins (my 3rd and final handle is using rakeback because I want to make money playing cards /images/graemlins/laugh.gif )
2) My original numbers were the BEST, Ive actually gone down in BB/100 since then, perhaps it was a fluke?
3) I multi-table 3-4 tables at a time; usually 4.
4) All stats are 2/4 limit at full ring @ Party & Skins.
Give me pretty much any comment you want to make given the numbers and the things I say with each set of numbers. I am thirsty for criticisms, encouragements, etc.
-----------------------------------------------------------
*** OVERALL STATS *** (3 diff IDs; aggregate numbers)
VP$IP = 20.1%
PFR% = 8.88%
BB/100= 1.91
*** First Handle @ PP ***
NOTES: I was playing after freshly reading SuperSystem 2 (Jennifer Harmon's Limit Play Section) and Phil Hellmuth's Play Poker Like The Pro's. I was playing more hands regardless of position, 3 betting small PP to single limper/raisers to isolate, hardly ever check-raised (0.64% of possible actions)and in general being more aggressive pre-flop & flop.
Sample Size = 15,122 hands
VP$IP = 22.81%
PFT% = 10.65%
BB/100= 2.46
AGF = 2.54
PT classification = SLA/A
WT SD = 33.47%
W$SD = 51.64%
*** 2nd Handle @ Empire ***
I had lost a bit of steam @ PP in the last 5k hands or so before I made this handle to clear a bonus and get a copy of PokerEdge (useless program to me now, I don't ever run it). I also wanted to start with a fresh name and a new game. I decided to pay more attention to position, stop 3 betting pre-flop with small/mid PP and some other general things I picked up reading around the net. I wanted to be TA/A which I heard was the best to be (not to mention noticed the TA/A at the tables were making a good bit).
Sample Size = 13,011 hands
VP$IP = 18.58%
PFR% = 8.1%
BB/100= 1.7
AGF = 2.74
PT Classification = TA/A
WT SD = 28.15%
W$SD = 56.85%
*** 3rd Handle @ Eurobet ***
Decided I wanted to take advantage of rakeback after seeing the amounts I was paying to the house were damn near what I was winning! I also purchased and read Small Stakes Hold'em after hearing so much about it here at 2+2 while lurking. Thus, my goal, was to be more selectively tight and really work on improving my game. I got off to a terrible -115 BB start in the first 3k hands and have since worked it back into the black. These stats are current.
Sample Size = 9,829 hands
VP$IP = 18.12%
PFR = 7.17%
BB/100= 1.28
AGF = 2.62
PT Classification = TA/A
WT SD = 28.77%
W$SD = 57.41%
-----------------------------------------------------------
I gave myself 4 months starting April 1st to learn Low Limit Poker which is about all I can afford before I have to actually use any of the money from the bankroll for living expenses. I live in a part of the country with low living expenses, thus, it isn't hard to subsist on ~1k a month given a certain lifestyle that I am accustomed to being a recent college grad. However, I would like to pull 50k/year+, which I hear is not unheard of w/ internet play and rakeback. I do not play much at the local casino's as they mostly offer 3/6/12, 10/20, and 1/3 NL. I figure I might try the 10/20 out when I move up, and start doing well (2+ bb/100) in the 3/6 online games.
Originally I planned to stick to 2/4 until I was crushing them @ 3BB/100 with 100k+ hand sampling before moving up? What do you think of this plan? Is that too lofty a goal? Is it even acheivable/sustainable? Should I simply hit and sustain 2BB/100 and then move up to 3/6? ** I've dabbled in 3/6 but w/2k hands Im not ready to post those numbers as I don't think they have any statistical significance. **
Anyway, any comments, criticisms, reccomendations, etc are appreciated.