View Full Version : What Payout would you prefer? and why?
theordinaryboy
05-08-2005, 02:59 PM
What Payout would you prefer? and why?
Maulik
05-08-2005, 03:00 PM
I like getting 2x for the 3rd place finish, its saying, you didn't waste time, you're a WINNER
the second one is so much better, becauswe it gives incentive u play aggressiveley on bubble. The 45/45/10 is a satelite like payout
flyby4553
05-08-2005, 03:24 PM
No question the second is better. In the first option third ends up down money while there is no difference between first and second. Whats the benefit in building up a big stack on the bubble if it has no effect once your down to HU play?
Cry Me A River
05-08-2005, 04:44 PM
The first one sucks, for all the reasons mentioned. However, something like this might be interesting:
1st = 40% 2nd = 25% 3rd = 20% 4th = 15%
Since it would mean a huge ITM% for good players vs fish and the jump between 1st and 2nd is enough to make playing for 1st worthwhile. (ie: 1st+4th>2nd+2nd)
Freudian
05-08-2005, 04:45 PM
I would prefer
1st: 30%
2nd: 20%
3rd: 50%
Why? I would make more money.
beeyjay
05-08-2005, 04:55 PM
It'd be fun to play a tourney like this just to watch everybody trying to go out 3rd. I'd be so pissed when my 39 sucked out on some dudes ak
KingDan
05-08-2005, 04:55 PM
I like having a difference in payouts for first and second. Playing against an opponent who folds a lot heads up is fun.
theordinaryboy
05-08-2005, 05:02 PM
ok maybe this will change your mind
how about
1st = 45%
2nd = 45%
3rd = 10%
vs
1st = 45%
2nd = 27%
3rd = 18%
This is because you dont pay any rake charge for the first one!!!
Does this make any difference?
AJ_Rider
05-08-2005, 05:58 PM
Psychologically it'd be rough, and the variance and ROR would be a bit unruly, but I would make the most money if the structure were 100% 1st.
So instead, how about 65% 1st, 25% 2nd, 15% 3rd? Or 75% 1st, 25% 2nd? Comments?
valenzuela
05-08-2005, 06:25 PM
Ppl were paid to analyze the sitation carefully, Ill ask partypoker why do they have that payout structure.
Freudian
05-08-2005, 06:48 PM
[ QUOTE ]
Psychologically it'd be rough, and the variance and ROR would be a bit unruly, but I would make the most money if the structure were 100% 1st.
So instead, how about 65% 1st, 25% 2nd, 15% 3rd? Or 75% 1st, 25% 2nd? Comments?
[/ QUOTE ]
It would be way too top heavy, penalizing the fish further. Remember that they need encouragment by making some money now and then, otherwise they will play something else.
I think the current structure is fine.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.