Alex/Mugaaz
05-07-2005, 06:31 AM
I feel this is the weakest part of my game at the moment. Few general questions. I would appreciate general answers or conceptual ones.
1) Value betting on the river (without the nuts)- Gah, this infuriates me. I consistently feel like I'm in one of those situations where the only hand that will call me is a better one, and he'll raise. Then I get put in the horribly ugly situations where you're ALMOST sure you're beat but the pot odds are strong.
A) It's been my experience that if you have a strong but vulnerable hand that it usually ends up you betting PF/Flop/Turn nice and aggressively, and you'll end up with a guy calling you all the way. When he checks to you on the river 95% of the time checking right back seems correct to me. I feel they either missed their hand, were slowplaying the whole way, or hit their draw. Comments?
B) Now in first position I feel lost here. Checking the river is a HUGE sign of weakness. However all the conditions from A still apply, putting me in what I feel is the worst possible place. I know this is tremendously weak but I've been defaulting to checking here and inducing a bluff / gauging my opponents strength by the size of his bet. I know there is a much better way, help!
2) Bluffing the river. Is it pointless? I feel like the only better hand that will fold is something like a bottom pair 4 flush, and it's so expensive to place a meaningful bet here.
A) This is the only position where I've wondering if a mini-bet actually is a good play. What do you think? I haven't used it but I've noticed that when weaker players do it what usually ends up happening is a worse player might call with the worst hand / not raise with a better. Think there is any point to this? It seems incredibly lame, but the cost / benefit ratio seems good enough, obviosuly it won't work on any player with a clue.
3) Finally, what do with a great hand when it looks like a flush / straight draw just completed on the river. Again, I feel like it's one of those places where betting can only be called by a better hand. The problem is checking may be worse. I'm at a big loss here.
I really appreciate any thoughts. Gogo 2+2 thinktank.
1) Value betting on the river (without the nuts)- Gah, this infuriates me. I consistently feel like I'm in one of those situations where the only hand that will call me is a better one, and he'll raise. Then I get put in the horribly ugly situations where you're ALMOST sure you're beat but the pot odds are strong.
A) It's been my experience that if you have a strong but vulnerable hand that it usually ends up you betting PF/Flop/Turn nice and aggressively, and you'll end up with a guy calling you all the way. When he checks to you on the river 95% of the time checking right back seems correct to me. I feel they either missed their hand, were slowplaying the whole way, or hit their draw. Comments?
B) Now in first position I feel lost here. Checking the river is a HUGE sign of weakness. However all the conditions from A still apply, putting me in what I feel is the worst possible place. I know this is tremendously weak but I've been defaulting to checking here and inducing a bluff / gauging my opponents strength by the size of his bet. I know there is a much better way, help!
2) Bluffing the river. Is it pointless? I feel like the only better hand that will fold is something like a bottom pair 4 flush, and it's so expensive to place a meaningful bet here.
A) This is the only position where I've wondering if a mini-bet actually is a good play. What do you think? I haven't used it but I've noticed that when weaker players do it what usually ends up happening is a worse player might call with the worst hand / not raise with a better. Think there is any point to this? It seems incredibly lame, but the cost / benefit ratio seems good enough, obviosuly it won't work on any player with a clue.
3) Finally, what do with a great hand when it looks like a flush / straight draw just completed on the river. Again, I feel like it's one of those places where betting can only be called by a better hand. The problem is checking may be worse. I'm at a big loss here.
I really appreciate any thoughts. Gogo 2+2 thinktank.