20+2 QQ

[bones]

Converter not working.

***** Hand History for Game 2009295311 *****
NL Hold'em $20 Buy-in + $2 Entry Fee Trny:11974521 Level:1 Blinds(10/15) - Friday, May 06, 19:24:10 EDT 2005
Table Table 14000 (Real Money)
Seat 10 is the button
Total number of players : 10
Seat 3: tturner17 ( $785 )
Seat 5: woshidragon ( $1150 )
Seat 9: mike_moffet ( $775 )
Seat 8: stevenjonell ( $715 )
Seat 1: crimdog02 ( $740 )
Seat 2: Zep4aces ( $855 )
Seat 7: Vinnyb9009 ( $485 )
Seat 4: jackandlo ( $715 )
Seat 6: keek_ ( $700 )
Seat 10: jock111 ( $1080 )
Trny:11974521 Level:1
Blinds(10/15)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to mike_moffet [ Qd Qh ]
tturner17 calls [15].
jackandlo folds.
woshidragon folds.
keek_ calls [15].
Vinnyb9009 folds.
stevenjonell folds.
mike_moffet raises [85].
jock111 folds.
crimdog02 folds.
Zep4aces folds.
tturner17 calls [70].
keek_ calls [70].
** Dealing Flop ** [ Kh, 9d, 8c ]
tturner17 checks.
keek_ is all-In [615]
mike_moffet folds.
tturner17 folds.
keek_ does not show cards.
keek_ wins 895 chips

It's an easy fold, but...

Why would he play a K like that? or a set? If I have AK, I call for sure. Even KQ. Aces I call. The more I think about the hand, the more I think I was ahead of something like TT.

I realize the default play is to fold and play on. I'm interested to see if anyone calls and what their reasoning is.

[Phoenix1010]

Don't call. There's no hand he could have for which that would be a reasonable play. Which means that he is unreasonable, and you can't have any idea what he has. He's as likely to do this with a king as he would be with a 9. Don't gamble with these folks, and don't bother trying too hard to get in their heads, there's not much going on up there. Get your money in when you're a clear favorite, he's waiting to dump to you.

I'll go ahead and put him on JT as his most likely hand, if you're curious. I'd still fold because of the large possibilty that I'm behind, and the fact that I'm drawing very thin when I am.

-Phoenix