View Full Version : I took Josh's Preflop Challenge for 1000 hands
LAG reporting here....
I took Josh's Preflop challenge while clearing my bonus at PokerRoom. At one point, an observant player sucked with out with K2 (caught 2 pair on the river), and I had AA. He said "You've been raising with so much crap over there, now you had it!". I laughed at that point and said, "Good point." I was raising things like K9s and so forth from LP.
I lost money. (Not necessarily due to this topic)
However, I do think I learned some of what the point was. And I think the point was to see how powerful the PF raise is and just how much position really benefits you.
Also, it was a lot of fun!
sthief09
04-28-2005, 01:06 PM
can you list some of the raises you had to make that you don't normally make?
Certainly, I'd like to post some, but I've just found out how to get my PokerRoom HH into PT (I needed the new version of PT, I just had the old one).
Anyway:
Small suited Broadways - this is a fairly common raise for me in LP with only 1 or 2 limpers that play poorly, but I did it regardless of the action or the limpers yesterday.
Small pps - I don't raise these LP, almost ever. There were a couple of times when I flopped my set on a really ragged non-broadway board and really cashed in because of the deception involved in the PF raise.
Mid pairs EP - mostly 77,88 as I frequently with raise 99 in a loose game. I was amazed at how frequently it was simply folded around at that point.
Suited connectors - 67s, 78s, 89s, 9Ts - the one thing I really liked about this was that I was often offered a free card on the flop if I felt like it.
Suited Aces and K9s
I'm going to download my HH when I get home, and see what my stats were, but I want to say I was real close to about 18/15. For some reason, the spirit of this challenge had me loosen up as well....
slogger
04-28-2005, 01:53 PM
I think I get the gist of it, but what specifically was involved in the challenge?
PokerBob
04-28-2005, 01:55 PM
[ QUOTE ]
I think I get the gist of it, but what specifically was involved in the challenge?
[/ QUOTE ]
limping=illegal except for 22-44 or something like that.
link (http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showthreaded.php?Cat=&Number=2244626&page=&view=&s b=5&o=)
DMBFan23
04-28-2005, 02:16 PM
did you do any folding in EP with hands that you'd normally limp? which ones?
private joker
04-28-2005, 02:31 PM
[ QUOTE ]
can you list some of the raises you had to make that you don't normally make?
[/ QUOTE ]
Time for me to hijack this thread -- sorry Q-Tip.
I played 6/12 at Commerce last night and ran card dead for a long time, so I got bored and decided not to limp preflop unless I had to. There were two hands I raised PF where I wouldn't normally.
Hand 1: I have K/images/graemlins/diamond.gif T/images/graemlins/diamond.gif in MP1. UTG limps, UTG+1 folds, I RAISE, and the CO and button both cold-call. It's 5 to the flop, which is 953 with one diamond. Checked to me, I bet, they all call. Turn is the Q/images/graemlins/diamond.gif, I bet, get 3 callers. River is Q/images/graemlins/spade.gif, I check, everyone checks. We show down our hands -- I say "I missed my straight and missed my flush" and show K-high. Everyone nods and folds, and MHIG /images/graemlins/cool.gif
Hand 2: I have J/images/graemlins/heart.gif 9/images/graemlins/heart.gif UTG+1. UTG limps, I raised, folded around, blinds fold too. Heads up. Flop is KTx. Check, bet, call. Turn Q. Check, bet, he folds.
2 for 2.
Unfortunately, the other PFR hands I had were obvious: AKs, QQ, TT, and AKs again. I lost with all of them. /images/graemlins/smirk.gif
(Totally off-topic from this thread -- a dude sat down at the table with a copy of SSHE. I initially thought he was a devious 2+2er who was trying to make people think he was a donk while snowballing everyone with TAG play, but it quickly became clear he actually was that stupid. He played like crap; amazing that he was so open about bringing the book to the table -- he didn't even try to hide it; he lifted it up onto the felt and then made a commotion about stowing it. He lost about $200).
shant
04-28-2005, 02:39 PM
[ QUOTE ]
(Totally off-topic from this thread -- a dude sat down at the table with a copy of SSHE. I initially thought he was a devious 2+2er who was trying to make people think he was a donk while snowballing everyone with TAG play, but it quickly became clear he actually was that stupid. He played like crap; amazing that he was so open about bringing the book to the table -- he didn't even try to hide it; he lifted it up onto the felt and then made a commotion about stowing it. He lost about $200).
[/ QUOTE ]
I'm dissapointed you didn't call me up because I would've drove to Commerce just to see this.
Did he ever call time and open it during a hand to see what he should do?
pokerstudAA
04-28-2005, 02:42 PM
[ QUOTE ]
Small pps - I don't raise these LP, almost ever. There were a couple of times when I flopped my set on a really ragged non-broadway board and really cashed in because of the deception involved in the PF raise.
[/ QUOTE ]
/images/graemlins/laugh.gif How about that! Amazingly people start check raising the turn with top pair against your aggressive betting.
DMBFan23
04-28-2005, 02:49 PM
hand 1 is a super standard pf raise in my playbook, for what that's worth
private joker
04-28-2005, 02:56 PM
[ QUOTE ]
hand 1 is a super standard pf raise in my playbook, for what that's worth
[/ QUOTE ]
For me it is from MP3-CO-Button, but in EP I've been raising KJs and better. QTs and KTs I've been limping.
DMBFan23
04-28-2005, 02:58 PM
I usually raise KJs UTG, KTs from UTG+1 on, and I save QTs for either an open raise or a MP3-CO-Button isolatelimpers/getvalue/buybutton/freecard raise
EDIT: I'm not trying to nitpick because I think it's fine to limp KTs. I just raise it and it's worked well for me so far, without having the pokertracker data in front of me.
private joker
04-28-2005, 03:01 PM
[ QUOTE ]
Did he ever call time and open it during a hand to see what he should do?
[/ QUOTE ]
No, but me and another guy were subtly making fun of him to each other (I don't think he heard; he was at the other end of the table). One time a board was QQ75 on the turn, and a tight player checked to him, he bet, and the EP guy check-raised. The SSHE-reader 3-bet the turn. He had A7. (Obviously the opponent had a Q). My neighbor and I looked at each other and said, "Chapter 12."
Later, the board was K9xT on the turn, and the river paired Ts. The SSHE-reader bet, and a super-passive lady in LP raised him -- anyone who has been remotely observant knows this lady has constantly checked top pair, and checked 2 pair whenever a straight was possible. She would never raise here without a T, and indeed she had KT for the boat. He actually called her raise and threw down AA. He got angry. My neighbor and I looked at each other and said, "Chapter 4."
shant
04-28-2005, 03:07 PM
[ QUOTE ]
"Chapter 12."
[/ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
"Chapter 4."
[/ QUOTE ]
Brilliant, in my opinion.
Chris Dow
04-28-2005, 03:12 PM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
"Chapter 12."
[/ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
"Chapter 4."
[/ QUOTE ]
Brilliant, in my opinion.
[/ QUOTE ]
If I ever get the chance to do this with a neighbor, it will make at least my month, if not my year. Hillarious.
SSHE is not divided into numerical chapters. Discuss.
For those that have their sarcasm detectors turned off - /images/graemlins/tongue.gif
Chris Dow
04-28-2005, 03:20 PM
You ass.
I had to actually run over to my copy upon reading this, can you imagine my disappointment? Well, can you, punk?
For the sarcasm detectorless among us: /images/graemlins/tongue.gif
Victor
04-28-2005, 03:25 PM
hahaha....thats how i play normally.
sthief09
04-28-2005, 04:04 PM
[ QUOTE ]
Suited Aces.
[/ QUOTE ]
clark is all about the suited aces. I kinda think they suck out of position. I like them in LP where I can get to showdown cheap or judge when I am or am not good. I also think the wheel aces are infinitely better than A6 and A7
Ed talks about the wheel power over kicker power thought in SSHE. His thoughts were that the kicker was much more improtant, and I do agree with that. His thoughts were that perhaps A5s was somewhat better than A6s, but that's as far as he would go.
sthief09
04-28-2005, 04:30 PM
[ QUOTE ]
Ed talks about the wheel power over kicker power thought in SSHE. His thoughts were that the kicker was much more improtant, and I do agree with that. His thoughts were that perhaps A5s was somewhat better than A6s, but that's as far as he would go.
[/ QUOTE ]
Page me please. I don't recall that.
sthief09
04-28-2005, 04:31 PM
I'd limp J9s in that spot FWIW unless the table was tight
Page 70 1st paragraph. That's w/o looking! Just kidding...
Also, there's a footnote on that section that says the following:
"For more on this topic, see p. 151 of The Complete Book of Hold'em Poker by Gary Carson."
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.