ok so I took a shot

[p0t_Commit3d]

After having an incredible start, I decided to try my luck at the 100s.

I played one. I lost. But I'll be back. I know I can beat that level.

[Shanemex]

Is that sample size sufficient?

[raptor517]

yea i think 1 is enough to know where you stand. holla

[syphlix]

0% ROI?... dude that sucks... that's like... -$654/hour... what a crappy rate... i'm not sure something like that is sustainable long term though...

[DasLeben]

Maybe you just suck at poker. I money every tourney I enter. WTF is wrong with you?

[Jman28]

[ QUOTE ]
0% ROI?... dude that sucks... that's like... -$654/hour... what a crappy rate... i'm not sure something like that is sustainable long term though...

[/ QUOTE ]

Actually, I believe his ROI would be -100%

[mike28]

Did you lose your roll or something? Play another?

[Eihli]

not funny... some people suck when it comes to forum comedy.

we need more people like born 2 loose
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showthreaded.php?Cat=&Number=2234756&page=0&view=c ollapsed&sb=5&o=14&vc=1

[p0t_Commit3d]

It wasnt meant to be a gut buster.

It was just an uncontrolable diariah of the mouth. I wanted to bring humanity into my supernatural game. Otherwise no one will play with me.

As far as sample size.. why does everyone bring that up when its obvious anyways?

As far as knowing I can beat a game after one try at it then I understand what you mean BUT...

To clarify. I have watched several 100s and 200s and quite a few 50s too. I cant say with 100% that I can sit down and beat the 100s right NOW, but I can say with absolute gusto that I WILL beat that game eventutaly. I have played poker long enough to know my limitations~~NONE~~

As long as their are some fish at the 100s then I will be a winner there in due time.