$Buy-in level and ROI

[minwoo]

[Degen]

never done the 109's or 215's but halfway through my first 1k 50+5's 20%+ seems pretty do-able.


Andre

[Scuba Chuck]

[ QUOTE ]
never done the 109's or 215's but halfway through my first 1k 50+5's 20%+ seems pretty do-able.


[/ QUOTE ]

In theory I agree. But have not been able to produce. My first 500 $55s ~ 12%. Not so great.

I'm not going to vote, so I wish you would just post the results so I can see them.

[valenzuela]

the poll wont work , many will vote " guessing" so they can see the results( cough, me)

[allenciox]

I answered all easy, but my answer is really in between. I played $50s for awhile, before moving up to $100, then moving up to $200. I have 25% ROI in the 50s, 21% in the 100s, and 18% in the 200s over approx. 2000 tourneys split over the three buyins. I believe the ROI DOES go down when you go up levels, and there is some adjustment that has to be made when you go up levels, but it is worth it, if you play well. Note that I rarely multitable --- when I do, it is two tables at most. That's because I want to get better (maybe play WSOP someday) and really getting a read on players I believe is important for that.

[Bigwig]

Well, I've got over 25% at $50's, with over 800 SNGs. And I'm no poker genius.

I think sustaining a high ROI at the 200's (above 10%) has to be the hardest. Because if you can do that multi-tabling, you're making more than 99.8% of the population. That's never easy.