PDA

View Full Version : Mason e-mail

JGalt
04-17-2005, 09:33 PM
Discuss (http://www.learn-texas-holdem.com/texas-holdem-hand-groupings.htm)
[censored]
04-17-2005, 09:38 PM
Site operator = scumbag.

enough said.
NLSoldier
04-17-2005, 09:40 PM
All I know is that the 2nd chart ranks KTs waaaay too high.
scotty34
04-17-2005, 09:46 PM
[ QUOTE ]
Modified Hold'em Hand Groupings:

Group 1: AA KKQQ JJ AKs
Group 2: TT AQs AJs KQs AK
Group 3: 99 KTs QJs KJs ATs AQ
Group 4: A8s KQ 88 QTs A9s AT AJ JTs
Group 5: 77 Q9s KJ QJ JT A7s A6s A5s A4s A3s A2s J9s T9s K9s KT QT
Group 6: 66 J8s 98s T8s 55 J9 43s 75s T9 33 98 64s 22 K8s K7s K6s K5s K4s K3s K2s Q8s 44 87s 97s
Group 7: 87 53s A9 Q9 76s 42s 32s 96s 85s J8 J7s 65 54 74s K9 T8 76 65s 54s 86s

[/ QUOTE ]

53s is stronger than 86s and 54s?
54o is stronger than 54s?
No wonder I'm such a bad poker player
InchoateHand
04-17-2005, 09:47 PM
[ QUOTE ]
53s is stronger than 86s and 54s?
54o is stronger than 54s?
No wonder I'm such a bad poker player

[/ QUOTE ]

ni han
spamuell
04-17-2005, 09:49 PM
[ QUOTE ]
All I know is that the 2nd chart ranks KTs waaaay too high.

[/ QUOTE ]

I hate talking about poker here and I know you might not believe me because of the original HEPFAP charts, but KTs is actually a better hand than JTs.

EDIT: Btw, these second charts clearly put hands they put in different groups in random/swapped places, regardless of what the site says.
wacki
04-17-2005, 09:59 PM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
53s is stronger than 86s and 54s?
54o is stronger than 54s?
No wonder I'm such a bad poker player

[/ QUOTE ]

ni han

[/ QUOTE ]

Group, look it up in the dictionary.
scotty34
04-17-2005, 10:04 PM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
53s is stronger than 86s and 54s?
54o is stronger than 54s?
No wonder I'm such a bad poker player

[/ QUOTE ]

ni han

[/ QUOTE ]

Group, look it up in the dictionary.

[/ QUOTE ]

At the top of the page

[ QUOTE ]
The hands are listed in groups from strongest to weakest. Also within each grouping, the stronger hands are listed first so in Sklansky Group3, 99 is supposedly stronger then AQ

[/ QUOTE ]
PoBoy321
04-17-2005, 10:05 PM
The original site says that within each group, hands are listed according to their strength, with hands listed earlier being stronger, and hands listed later being weaker. 54s is listed after 54o.
istewart
04-17-2005, 10:05 PM
Pwned, look it up in the dictionary.
The Dude
04-17-2005, 10:26 PM
[ QUOTE ]
Site operator = scumbag.

[/ QUOTE ]
I hope you're referring to the other site's operator, and not Mason. I assume you are.
[censored]
04-17-2005, 10:28 PM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Site operator = scumbag.

[/ QUOTE ]
I hope you're referring to the other site's operator, and not Mason. I assume you are.

[/ QUOTE ]

yes. He was asked nicely to take it down and hasn't. Legal or not it seems like a scumbag thing to do.
wacki
04-17-2005, 10:29 PM
[ QUOTE ]
Pwned, look it up in the dictionary.

[/ QUOTE ]

Agreed, I am a donk.
disjunction
04-17-2005, 10:32 PM
He was implicitly threatened.

When on the receiving end of a threat demanding an action A, people tend to want to do the opposite of A, especially when they perceive the threat to be a bluff. The desired effect is to reduce the bluffing frequency of one's opponents (while this may not be a good idea in Hold'em, it is often a good idea in life).