phrosty
04-16-2005, 07:43 AM
I'd like some opinions on this play. I don't think I would have played it like this if the stacks were deeper-probably would have taken a flop looking for a set. That's where my question really is though, if I'm willing to play it this aggressively at low-limit against a short stack why would it be wrong to do the same thing at a higher limit/deeper stack situation?
Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $ BB (10 handed) converter
UTG+2 ($10.35)
MP1 ($24.75)
MP2 ($25)
MP3 ($11.8)
CO ($23.35)
Button ($11.6)
SB ($25.1)
BB ($22.68)
Hero ($23.75)
UTG+1 ($23.15)
Preflop: Hero is UTG with T, T. MP2 posts a blind of $0.25. SB posts a blind of $0.1.
Hero calls $0.25, 1 fold, UTG+2 raises to $2, 1 fold, MP2 (poster) calls $1.75, 5 folds, Hero raises to $10.35, UTG+2 calls $8.35 (All-In), MP2 folds.
Flop: ($23.05) 5, 3, 8 (2 players, 1 all-in)
Turn: ($23.05) 6 (2 players, 1 all-in)
River: ($23.05) 6 (2 players, 1 all-in)
Final Pot: $23.05
Post Extras
Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $ BB (10 handed) converter
UTG+2 ($10.35)
MP1 ($24.75)
MP2 ($25)
MP3 ($11.8)
CO ($23.35)
Button ($11.6)
SB ($25.1)
BB ($22.68)
Hero ($23.75)
UTG+1 ($23.15)
Preflop: Hero is UTG with T, T. MP2 posts a blind of $0.25. SB posts a blind of $0.1.
Hero calls $0.25, 1 fold, UTG+2 raises to $2, 1 fold, MP2 (poster) calls $1.75, 5 folds, Hero raises to $10.35, UTG+2 calls $8.35 (All-In), MP2 folds.
Flop: ($23.05) 5, 3, 8 (2 players, 1 all-in)
Turn: ($23.05) 6 (2 players, 1 all-in)
River: ($23.05) 6 (2 players, 1 all-in)
Final Pot: $23.05
Post Extras