ceskylev
04-14-2005, 11:31 PM
to have a swing like this and be playing well enough to win long-term at Party 2/4? Or maybe I should ask if it's realistic.
Over about 4500 hands I'm down over 170BB. I know that's not any kind of record, but this is my first shot at 2/4 since reading SSHE. I'm more than frustrated.
I was winning at a good clip (3.8 BB/100) for about 8000 hands, and now I'm tanking. I didn't expect that rate to hold, but I felt like I was playing good poker in addition to running good. After my last -60BB session I'm starting to expect to lose, which I know is deadly.
During this particular mess, AKs, AK, AQs, AQ, AJs, KQs, suited aces A9 and under, and pairs 99 and lower are all big fat losers, and losing half the bankroll has me thinking of moving down to 1/2 *again* where I'm a consistent winner over 60 or 70K hands.
Yes, the 2/4 sample sizes are too small. Yes, anything can happen over 10, 20, 30K hands. No, you guys don't know if I'm a good player or not. But if anyone make an effort at the following questions, even in the abstract, I'd be grateful.
How big, in your estimation, is the jump from full ring Party 1/2 to Party 2/4?
Should most 1/2 winners (say 2- 2.5 BB/100) be able to make that jump?
Forget about me, what's the likelihood that a good player loses 170BB over only 4000 hands?
Thanks, folks,
-kd
Over about 4500 hands I'm down over 170BB. I know that's not any kind of record, but this is my first shot at 2/4 since reading SSHE. I'm more than frustrated.
I was winning at a good clip (3.8 BB/100) for about 8000 hands, and now I'm tanking. I didn't expect that rate to hold, but I felt like I was playing good poker in addition to running good. After my last -60BB session I'm starting to expect to lose, which I know is deadly.
During this particular mess, AKs, AK, AQs, AQ, AJs, KQs, suited aces A9 and under, and pairs 99 and lower are all big fat losers, and losing half the bankroll has me thinking of moving down to 1/2 *again* where I'm a consistent winner over 60 or 70K hands.
Yes, the 2/4 sample sizes are too small. Yes, anything can happen over 10, 20, 30K hands. No, you guys don't know if I'm a good player or not. But if anyone make an effort at the following questions, even in the abstract, I'd be grateful.
How big, in your estimation, is the jump from full ring Party 1/2 to Party 2/4?
Should most 1/2 winners (say 2- 2.5 BB/100) be able to make that jump?
Forget about me, what's the likelihood that a good player loses 170BB over only 4000 hands?
Thanks, folks,
-kd