PDA

View Full Version : Hit the nuts on the turn.......


mtdoak
04-14-2005, 02:21 AM
Can I play it any better?

Party Poker 3/6 Hold'em (8 handed) converter (http://www.selachian.com/tools/bisonconverter/hhconverter.cgi)

Preflop: Hero is SB with 8/images/graemlins/spade.gif, 7/images/graemlins/diamond.gif.
<font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, UTG+1 calls, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, CO calls, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, Hero completes, BB checks.

Flop: (4 SB) 5/images/graemlins/club.gif, 6/images/graemlins/diamond.gif, J/images/graemlins/diamond.gif <font color="#0000FF">(4 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, BB calls, UTG+1 calls, CO calls.

Turn: (4 BB) 9/images/graemlins/spade.gif <font color="#0000FF">(4 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, BB calls, <font color="#CC3333">UTG+1 raises</font>, CO calls, Hero calls, BB folds.

River: (11 BB) J/images/graemlins/spade.gif <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
Hero checks, <font color="#CC3333">UTG+1 bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">CO raises</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero 3-bets</font>, UTG+1 calls, <font color="#CC3333">CO caps</font>, Hero calls, UTG+1 calls.

Final Pot: 23 BB

Yobz
04-14-2005, 02:23 AM
I would 3-bet the turn and would probably muck this preflop

spoohunter
04-14-2005, 02:23 AM
Three bet the turn you have CO trapped.

Shillx
04-14-2005, 02:23 AM
GET THE MONEY IN THE POT WHILE PEOPLE ARE DRAWING!!!!!!!!

Brad

Entity
04-14-2005, 02:24 AM
[ QUOTE ]
Can I play it any better?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes. This is an easy turn 3-bet.

uw_madtown
04-14-2005, 02:26 AM
[ QUOTE ]
I would 3-bet the turn and would probably muck this preflop

[/ QUOTE ]

Yup. I muck this PF 90% of the time -- there'd have to be a lot of limpers for me to play it. Turn 3-bet is absolutely necessary.

spoohunter
04-14-2005, 02:38 AM
I don't mind it at all. Others?

Spladle Master
04-14-2005, 02:44 AM
You three-bet the wrong street.

Onaflag
04-14-2005, 02:47 AM
Holy Cow!! Get that turn capped if you can!!

Now let's talk about your PF play.

Onaflag...........

KDawgCometh
04-14-2005, 02:48 AM
[ QUOTE ]
I don't mind it at all. Others?

[/ QUOTE ]

I do, its a 1/3 blind structure. You need several limpers before even considering completing this PF. He only had one or two I think. Muck that shite PF

jclin
04-14-2005, 02:51 AM
I agree with 3-bet on turn. I'm prone to play this preflop too...I don't mind the call.

What is most interesting is the river. No bet? CO coming out of nowhere is probably AJ-TJ, as I imagine that CO would have gotten in the raise at turn if he had a set (unless it is JJ /images/graemlins/grin.gif).

wrto4556
04-14-2005, 02:56 AM
I dont like the call preflop, either. Maybe him and nate know something I don't.....

uw_madtown
04-14-2005, 03:06 AM
[ QUOTE ]
I dont like the call preflop, either. Maybe him and nate know something I don't.....

[/ QUOTE ]

This hand PF is entirely different from Nate's due to blind structure, number of limpers, and assumed aggression level of the game.

Nate's hand is a 1/2 blind structure, with many many limpers, in a very loose-passive live game. This is Party 3/6 which is much more aggro, it's a 1/3 blind structure, with only 2 limpers.

Same hand, same position, but one is an obvious fold and one is an obvious call.

KDawgCometh
04-14-2005, 03:24 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I dont like the call preflop, either. Maybe him and nate know something I don't.....

[/ QUOTE ]

This hand PF is entirely different from Nate's due to blind structure, number of limpers, and assumed aggression level of the game.

Nate's hand is a 1/2 blind structure, with many many limpers, in a very loose-passive live game. This is Party 3/6 which is much more aggro, it's a 1/3 blind structure, with only 2 limpers.

Same hand, same position, but one is an obvious fold and one is an obvious call.

[/ QUOTE ]

wouldn't 15/30 be a 2/3 blind structure, that was nate's post

uw_madtown
04-14-2005, 03:30 AM
[ QUOTE ]
wouldn't 15/30 be a 2/3 blind structure, that was nate's post

[/ QUOTE ]

I do believe you're right. Of course, that makes his PF call even MORE correct.

wrto4556
04-14-2005, 03:33 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
wouldn't 15/30 be a 2/3 blind structure, that was nate's post

[/ QUOTE ]

I do believe you're right. Of course, that makes his PF call even MORE correct.

[/ QUOTE ]

Nate was BB and called a raise.

EDIT: But I think he was getting better odds on the call. Im just too lazy to look.

uw_madtown
04-14-2005, 03:41 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
wouldn't 15/30 be a 2/3 blind structure, that was nate's post

[/ QUOTE ]

I do believe you're right. Of course, that makes his PF call even MORE correct.

[/ QUOTE ]

Nate was BB and called a raise.

EDIT: But I think he was getting better odds on the call. Im just too lazy to look.

[/ QUOTE ]

Eh, I should have checked Nate's post before responding so curtly.

Nonetheless, it's still true that his was a clear call and this is a clear fold IMO.

GrekeHaus
04-14-2005, 03:42 AM
[ QUOTE ]
Three bet the turn you have CO trapped.

[/ QUOTE ]

aggression = g00t!

Why on earth would you just call the nuts on the turn?

tacos
04-14-2005, 03:43 AM
I'd have mucked too. But since it happened, how about check-raising the flop?

I'd definitely reraise the turn.

brettbrettr
04-14-2005, 07:56 AM
[ QUOTE ]
I would 3-bet the turn and would muck this preflop

[/ QUOTE ]

chesspain
04-14-2005, 08:01 AM
[ QUOTE ]
I would 3-bet the turn and would probably muck this preflop

[/ QUOTE ]

Change probably to definately and we have a deal.