splashpot
04-13-2005, 02:26 PM
If one does a bit of studying, hold'em is a very easy game to not completely suck at. My theory is that anyone who genuinely wants to learn can spend one hour reading poker websites and improve to a marginally losing player. Tight prefop and semi-decent play postflop. Not a winning player, but good enough to not completely suck. Sure, there are still tons of players who play hold'em and suck, but IMO, those people have no desire to study the game. Agree or disagree?
It is also my opinion that other games such as 7stud and omaha are not as easy to learn. These games have many times more different situations than hold'em. Therefore it is much harder to play ABC poker. If one spent one hour reading websites on these games, I think they would be far from becoming a winning player. Agree or disagree?
Keeping these thoughts in mind, where to the truely sucky players play? My guess would be in omaha or stud, not hold'em. It's too easy to not suck at hold'em. While the other games require more serious study. Agree or disagree?
It is also my opinion that other games such as 7stud and omaha are not as easy to learn. These games have many times more different situations than hold'em. Therefore it is much harder to play ABC poker. If one spent one hour reading websites on these games, I think they would be far from becoming a winning player. Agree or disagree?
Keeping these thoughts in mind, where to the truely sucky players play? My guess would be in omaha or stud, not hold'em. It's too easy to not suck at hold'em. While the other games require more serious study. Agree or disagree?