John Hurst
04-07-2005, 04:48 PM
I like to think about poker at work. I like numbers.
So here is a question I tried to solve today:
If you have an ace in your hand and know an opponents range of calling hands how much less likely is it for your opponent to call an all-in given that there is 1 less Ace in the deck?
I just assumed a range of calling hands for a fairly tight player and ran some numbers.
Here it is:
Hand # of combinations w/4 Aces # of combos w/3
A10 32 24
AJ 32 24
AQ 32 24
AK 32 24
99 12 12
1010 12 12
JJ 12 12
QQ 12 12
KK 12 12
AA 12 6
Total: 232 186
Call % 9.5% 7.6%
So if you have an Ace in your hand you are getting called 2 fewer times per 100 pushes.
I found this pretty interesting and hopefully somebody else latches unto the concept and does some more useful work.
So here is a question I tried to solve today:
If you have an ace in your hand and know an opponents range of calling hands how much less likely is it for your opponent to call an all-in given that there is 1 less Ace in the deck?
I just assumed a range of calling hands for a fairly tight player and ran some numbers.
Here it is:
Hand # of combinations w/4 Aces # of combos w/3
A10 32 24
AJ 32 24
AQ 32 24
AK 32 24
99 12 12
1010 12 12
JJ 12 12
QQ 12 12
KK 12 12
AA 12 6
Total: 232 186
Call % 9.5% 7.6%
So if you have an Ace in your hand you are getting called 2 fewer times per 100 pushes.
I found this pretty interesting and hopefully somebody else latches unto the concept and does some more useful work.