Brom
04-04-2005, 04:45 AM
I have a simple (I think) definition problem for RoR, or risk of ruin, that I was hoping someone could give me a hand with.
I calculated my risk of ruin given; bankroll, standard deviation, and win rate, with the formula given at this site:
http://www.thepokerforum.com/angel1.htm
Now I'm not too concerned with the accuracy of the given formula (as long as it is reasonably close it's good enough for me), but I would like some help interpreting the result. I figured that my RoR was about 3%. Now what does that mean exactly? Does it mean that there's a 1 in 33 chance that if I play under those same conditions (BR, WR, SD) that I will go broke? If that's the case then how long would it take for me to lose that much money? I know that there's no way that I would ever sit long enough to lose that much money and I'd definetly stop before it got crucial. Does it mean that if I take that bankroll out into the world 100 times, (i.e. try to build a career out of it) I'd end up losing it about 3 times in those 100, assuming same conditions?
I calculated my risk of ruin given; bankroll, standard deviation, and win rate, with the formula given at this site:
http://www.thepokerforum.com/angel1.htm
Now I'm not too concerned with the accuracy of the given formula (as long as it is reasonably close it's good enough for me), but I would like some help interpreting the result. I figured that my RoR was about 3%. Now what does that mean exactly? Does it mean that there's a 1 in 33 chance that if I play under those same conditions (BR, WR, SD) that I will go broke? If that's the case then how long would it take for me to lose that much money? I know that there's no way that I would ever sit long enough to lose that much money and I'd definetly stop before it got crucial. Does it mean that if I take that bankroll out into the world 100 times, (i.e. try to build a career out of it) I'd end up losing it about 3 times in those 100, assuming same conditions?